文献求助Punctuated Generosity How Mega-events and Natural Disasters Affect Corpo

Punctuated GenerosityHow Mega-events and Natural Disasters Affect Corporate Philanthropy in U.S. Communities要求是ASQ上发表的那篇，本人已有工作论文，谢谢

• András Tilcsik1
• Christopher Marquis2
  

• 1University of Toronto
• 2Harvard University
  

Abstract

This article focuses on geographic communities as fields in which human-made and natural events occasionally disrupt the lives of organizations. We develop an institutional perspective to unpack how and why major events within communities affect organizations in the context of corporate philanthropy. To test this framework, we examine how different types of mega-events (the Olympics, the Super Bowl, political conventions) and natural disasters (such as floods and hurricanes) affected the philanthropic spending of locally headquartered Fortune 1000 firms between 1980 and 2006. Results show that philanthropic spending fluctuated dramatically as mega-events generally led to a punctuated increase in otherwise relatively stable patterns of giving by local corporations. The impact of natural disasters depended on the severity of damage: while major disasters had a negative effect, smaller-scale disasters had a positive impact. Firms’ philanthropic history and communities’ intercorporate network cohesion moderated some of these effects. This study extends the institutional and community literatures by illuminating the geographic distribution of punctuating events as a central mechanism for community influences on organizations, shedding new light on the temporal dynamics of both endogenous and exogenous punctuating events and providing a more nuanced understanding of corporate-community relations.

• Published online before printJanuary 22, 2013, doi:10.1177/0001839213475800Administrative Science Quarterly January 22, 20130001839213475800
  
  

请把你认为合格的回帖设置为“最佳答案”，否则就这一点点的论坛币也无法得到。谢谢合作。

giresse 发表于 2014-9-17 05:36
请把你认为合格的回帖设置为“最佳答案”，否则就这一点点的论坛币也无法得到。谢谢合作。

否则就这一点点的论坛币也无法得到。这一句话不明白？

我心永恒1 发表于 2014-9-17 09:01
否则就这一点点的论坛币也无法得到。这一句话不明白？

本帖子设置了1论坛币的悬赏，如果你不设置最佳答案，跟帖者就无法得到这个悬赏。

giresse 发表于 2014-9-17 09:21
本帖子设置了1论坛币的悬赏，如果你不设置最佳答案，跟帖者就无法得到这个悬赏。

明白了，好，遵守论坛规则

我心永恒1 发表于 2014-9-17 14:46
明白了，好，遵守论坛规则

多谢合作

giresse 发表于 2014-9-17 09:21
本帖子设置了1论坛币的悬赏，如果你不设置最佳答案，跟帖者就无法得到这个悬赏。

说了白天还是没有明白，只能我来设置了。

auirzxp 发表于 2014-11-23 10:54
说了白天还是没有明白，只能我来设置了。

看来，没有读懂咱们版规的人不在少数啊

giresse 发表于 2014-11-23 11:00
看来，没有读懂咱们版规的人不在少数啊

很多人都不按照规则发求助帖的。比如一个帖子里面求助多篇论文。


如果严格按照版规操作：“求助成功后三天内将主题分类“文献求助”修改为“求助成功”分类,未及时修改者扣20论坛币。未列出全文链接者将扣除10个论坛币劳务费。对于多次求助但不设置最佳答案被他人投诉的将失去求助权利。”那我估计会被投诉致死的。。。。。。