题目如下:
The Dutch Competition Authority (NMa) has stated that consumers have been overcharged for bread, cookies and pastries because of prohibited price fixing of milling companies. The NMa has fined fifteen major milling companies in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany for the total amount of 81.6 million euros. Involved in the cartel agreements were the Dutch companies Meneba Ranks Meel en Krijger Molenaars. The 3 companies were fined respectively EUR 9 million euro, 13.1 million euro and 71,000 euros.
The firm Koopmans was also involved in the price fixing, but this company did not get a fine because it reported the violation (whistleblower).
1. Describe the market in which Koopmans is active.
2a. Explain on the basis of the theory of oligopoly the consequences of price fixing.
2b. Show the graphic consequences of price fixing
3. Illustrate on the basis of game theory why price-fixing pays off. Tip: use a fictional numerical example.
4. Give an example from your own country where an oligopoly is active.
关于第一题, 如果Koopmans 公司 告密,那他家主营应该是成品? 那题目中所说的他家也设计价格垄断, 那此价格垄断 非 其它 公司一起所设计的价格垄断?
关于第二题, 是不是大致回答以下内容: 如果价格垄断, 消费者剩余减少,生产者剩余增加 , 最后导致DEADWEIGHT LOSS 增加。
第三题跟 第4题, 大神能不能给点提示。
谢谢


雷达卡




京公网安备 11010802022788号







