lianzhiguo 发表于 2016-11-10 20:54 
不躲不闪,《中华资本论》横空出世。
哈维教授指出马克思的行文表现方法是非常独特的,和弗洛伊德的心理分析思路有异曲同工之妙,是直接给出结论和概念,再去论证概念本身的意义,这样的表现手法给读者理解这些概念造成了很大的困难——因为读者只有完整的读完这本书之后才能理解概念对于他们的意义。(以下为翻译)
Marx is doing the same sort of
thing. In fact Marx is pioneering
马克思做的事情(和弗洛伊德)类似,事实上,马克思是开创了
this method in social science:
社会科学中的这个研究方法。
Start with the surface appearance;
find the deep concepts.
这个研究方法从表层现象和寻找深层的概念开始。
In Capital he's going to start with
the deep concepts. He's going to start
在《资本论》中他直接从深层的概念开始。他直接从
with the conclusions of his inquiries.
他研究的结论开始论述。
'What are my basic concepts?'
「我的基本概念是什么?」
And he lays these basic concepts out,
他将这些基本概念给出,
very simply, very directly,
非常简明,非常直接,
and indeed it looks like an a priori
construction. When you first read it
这样做看起来像是在构建一种「先验」的概念。当年第一次读到的时候,
you say,
你说,
'Where is all this stuff coming from?'
「这些概念都是从哪里来的?」
'Where'd he get it from?
Why is he doing that?'
「他从哪里得出这些概念的?他为什么这么做?」
And half the time you have no idea what
he's talking about with these concepts.
而你多数时候根本不清楚他对于这些概念到底讲的是什么。
But then bit by bit,
但之后一点点,
as you move on, you start to see how these
concepts are illuminating things going on around us.
随着你阅读深入,你开始看到这些概念如何阐述你周围的事物。
So after a while you start to say, 'Ah!
因此过了这个阶段你会开始说,「哈!」
'So that's what 'value theory' really means.'
「原来这才是价值理论的意义。」
'That's what the value argument is all about.'
「这才是他阐述价值的观点。」
'Ah! That is what this
fetish is all really all about.'
「哈!这才是拜物的意义!」
'That is what these
「这才是这些概念」
concepts are doing for me.'
「和我之间的联系。」
But in effect you only
understand how these concepts work
「但是只有在你读到这本书尾声的时候」
by the time you get
to the end of the book.
「你才会明白这些概念是如何作用的。」