楼主: lollipop
1345 0

[失业与通货膨胀] 几道关于增长理论的小题 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:203份资源

高中生

15%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
709 个
通用积分
2.1800
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
610 点
帖子
11
精华
0
在线时间
25 小时
注册时间
2005-3-9
最后登录
2020-5-14

楼主
lollipop 发表于 2009-9-6 18:01:28 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Does the basic     Solow growth model with labour-augmenting technology fit well with the     data? In your answer, be sure to explain important predictions made by     this theory and describe to what extent the evidence supports or refutes     the qualitative and quantitative predictions of the basic model. Does the     fit of the model improve when we consider human capital as an additional     input factor?

In the article     ‘Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than     others?’ by Hall and Jones (1999), around 50% of the differences in output     per worker across countries are due to the Solow residual. What factors     are identified as the causes of these large differences in the Solow     residual?

Consider theneoclassical growth model with overlapping generations of young and old agents.What is the effect on capital accumulation of the government financing publicconsumption by (a) taxing the young agents, (b) taxing the elderly, or (c)borrowing from the young and taxing them in old-age? Are the effects in thesecases the same or different? Explain.

有人有什么思路吗,多谢
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:增长理论 Neoclassical Quantitative accumulation differences 理论

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-29 13:25