楼主: songqb
667 0

[论文求助] 20金币求一篇论文 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:2份资源

高中生

12%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
3 个
通用积分
0.4500
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
124 点
帖子
11
精华
0
在线时间
30 小时
注册时间
2014-8-4
最后登录
2023-10-13

楼主
songqb 发表于 2017-4-20 15:53:34 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
1 论文标题
Assessing the impact of terrorist‐thwarting policies: An intervention time series approach2 作者信息
Walter EndersTodd SandlerJon Cauley
3 出处和链接(比如,NBER working paper No.11000)
《Defence Economics》, 1990, 2(2):1-18
4 摘要ABSTRACT This paper employs intervention or interrupted time series analysis to assess the effectiveness of four specific terrorist‐thwarting policies undertaken between January 5,1973 and April 15,1986. These policies include the following: (1) installation of metal detectors in airports, (2) enhanced security for U.S. embassies and personnel, (3) the legislation of the Reagan “get‐tough” laws on terrorism, and (4) the U.S. retaliatory strike against Libya. The use of intervention analysis allows for a study of the dynamic realization of a policy. Both short‐, medium‐, and long‐run effects can be ascertained. The most successful policy involved metal detectors. Expenditures to secure U.S. embassies had the intended effect, but it also had the unintended effect of putting non‐U.S. diplomats at somewhat greater risk. The Reagen get‐tough laws were ineffective. Unfortunately, the Libyan raid had the unintended effect of increasing U.S. and U.K. attacks temporarily.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:论文 信息

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-29 12:00