楼主: 86388853
3240 0

Paul Krugman: How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 1粉丝

已卖:91份资源

博士生

39%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1156 个
通用积分
33.7586
学术水平
3 点
热心指数
4 点
信用等级
3 点
经验
2424 点
帖子
168
精华
0
在线时间
403 小时
注册时间
2007-5-18
最后登录
2025-2-25

楼主
86388853 发表于 2009-10-21 18:56:24 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
在论坛看到该文的中文翻译版 现将原版献上 与大家共享


How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?
By PAUL KRUGMAN
I. MISTAKING BEAUTY FOR TRUTH
It’s hard to believe now, but not long ago economists were congratulating themselves over the success of their field. Those successes — or so they believed — were both theoretical and practical, leading to a golden era for the profession. On the theoretical side, they thought that they had resolved their internal disputes. Thus, in a 2008 paper titled “The State of Macro” (that is, macroeconomics, the study of big-picture issues like recessions), Olivier Blanchard of M.I.T., now the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, declared that “the state of macro is good.” The battles of yesteryear, he said, were over, and there had been a “broad convergence of vision.” And in the real world, economists believed they had things under control: the “central problem of depression-prevention has been solved,” declared Robert Lucas of the University of Chicago in his 2003 presidential address to the American Economic Association. In 2004, Ben Bernanke, a former Princeton professor who is now the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, celebrated the Great Moderation in economic performance over the previous two decades, which he attributed in part to improved economic policy making......
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Paul Krugman Economists Economist economis KRUGMAN Economists Paul DID Get wrong

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-27 05:18