楼主: prayer1982
23167 123

[学以致用] 关于“10支箭与40盗贼”的经济学解答 [推广有奖]

81
karuro 发表于 2011-9-29 17:19:39
要用经济学的知识求解 楼上的各位!!! 莫装B 装B被雷劈

82
wuygsg 发表于 2011-9-29 19:07:33
当面对25人时,受威胁的人死亡的概率是1/4,而总体强盗死亡的概率是6/24=1/4,此时已然相等。好,就算这5人跑了。剩下20人。接下来受到威胁的人死亡的概率仍然是1/4,但是总体死亡的概率是5/19,已然小于1/4。这样子他们就不会跑。
为什么概率不这样子算:第1轮中,受威胁的强盗死亡的概率是1/4,而其他强盗死亡的概率不是9/35?这样更能体现自己的投入产出和其他的强盗相比。

83
596291997 发表于 2011-9-29 23:29:08
哈哈,楼主说的好!

84
596291997 发表于 2011-10-15 08:24:24
感谢楼主分析啊!!

85
johnnoel 发表于 2011-10-15 22:35:50
PUZZLE
You are a hero with a broken sword (Conan, Boromir, or your favorite Dungeons and Dragons character) being chased by a troop of bad guys (bandits, orcs, . . .). Fortunately you are on a horse and they are not. Unfortunately your horse is tired and they will eventually run you down. Fortunately you have a bow. Unfortunately you have only ten arrows. Fortunately, being a hero, you never miss. Unfortunately there are 40 bad guys. The bad guys are strung out behind you, as shown.

Problem: Use economics to get away.

Note: You cannot talk to the bad guys. They are willing to take a substantial chance of being killed in order to get you--after all, they know you are a hero and are still coming. They know approximately how many arrows you have.
这是原题。。。
翻译没写Note。。。

86
buzhoushanshen 发表于 2011-10-20 17:13:18
靠,这种分析有意义吗,人家说撤退了就从博弈中消失了?人家可以退到射程之外啊,又没说射程之外的就永远追不上

87
小帅帅NAU 在职认证  发表于 2011-10-21 09:47:58
不是理性的。。。

88
geo0907303 发表于 2011-10-23 17:06:55
LZ很详细

89
qianlantiantang 发表于 2011-10-23 19:41:16
我认为分批威胁这一点不太可能准确的做到

90
mike523 发表于 2011-10-25 04:25:35
如果是这样干吗不一开始就说要杀死10个人 按照你的想法 不就能一发箭逼走9个?射死1个?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 11:56