楼主: 为在心中
364 1

[学习笔记] 【学习笔记】Economists can be philosophical realists about their models ... [推广有奖]

已卖:5462份资源

学科带头人

48%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
52875 个
通用积分
413.4606
学术水平
52 点
热心指数
64 点
信用等级
43 点
经验
13475 点
帖子
1954
精华
1
在线时间
648 小时
注册时间
2013-4-28
最后登录
2026-1-9

楼主
为在心中 发表于 2019-9-4 14:43:06 来自手机 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Economists can be philosophical realists about their models even though these describe
imaginary situations (von Thünen was a realist about his simplest model of the Isolated
State). This is because it is possible that the mechanisms in operation in those
imaginary situations are the same as, or similar to, those in operation in real situations.
A model captures significant truth if it contains a mechanism that is also operative in
real systems. This significant truth can be attained thanks to the false idealizations
employed by the model. Capturing this truth does not require any de-idealization by
way of relaxing those assumptions.
Unrealisticness in models is not intrinsically a bad thing. It is often a very good thing. It
may even be necessary for achieving important epistemic goals. Unrealistic
assumptions must be assessed in relation to their functions in modeling (such as fixing
a causal background in contrastive explanations, see Marchionni 2006). Whether an
assumption is duly or unduly unrealistic depends on its location in a theoretical
structure and the functions it is designed or able to serve.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
sophia615 + 30 精彩帖子

总评分: 论坛币 + 30   查看全部评分

爱生活,爱运动。

沙发
sophia615 发表于 2019-9-4 21:56:18
学习笔记奖!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-9 00:57