楼主: 豆粕期货122
312 0

[英文文献] Induced land use emissions due to first and second generation biofuels and ... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
豆粕期货122 发表于 2006-3-14 19:27:01 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Induced land use emissions due to first and second generation biofuels and uncertainty in land use emissions factors
英文文献作者:Taheripour, Farzad,Tyner, Wallace E.
英文文献摘要:
Much research has provided estimates of induced land use change and emissions for first generation biofuels. Relatively little has estimated land use change for the second generation cellulosic biofuels. In this paper we estimate induced land use change and emissions for these biofuels. Estimated emissions due to land use changes induced by biofuels production are uncertain not only because their associated land use changes are uncertain, but also because of uncertainty in the land use emissions factors (EFs). This paper also examines uncertainties related to these EFs and their assumptions. Three emissions factors including EFs obtained based on Woods Hole (WH) data, EFs developed by California Air Resources Board (CARB), and EFs obtained from the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) are examined. Using these three EFs, induced land use emissions are calculated for several biofuel pathways under alternative assumptions. The land use change results suggest that corn stover (and by implication other crop residues) have no significant induced land use change associated with biofuel production, but that is not the case for dedicated energy crops. Use of dedicated energy crops induces land use change and transfers natural land (in particular forest) to crop production. Producing bio-gasoline from miscanthus generates the lowest land requirement across all alterative pathways. The largest land requirement is associated with the switchgrass. The difference is due largely to the assumed yields of switchgrass and miscanthus in this analysis. The two major conclusions from this emissions analysis are: 1) inclusion or exclusion of cropland pasture makes a huge difference; and 2) there is wide divergence among the emission factor sources, especially for dedicated crop conversion to ethanol. Inclusion of cropland pasture emissions doubles or triples the emissions obtained using the WH EFs. The estimated induced land use emissions for ethanol and bio-gasoline produced from dedicated crops are essentially the same using the WH EFs, but vastly different using the CARB or TEM EFs factors, with cellulosic ethanol producing substantially more emissions.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-18 02:52