楼主: neauzhy
5539 3

Moody's 银行业评级方法和银行业打分卡一张(穆迪评级时使用的) [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:183份资源

高中生

17%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
775 个
通用积分
0.4800
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
176 点
帖子
17
精华
0
在线时间
20 小时
注册时间
2008-8-27
最后登录
2013-8-13

楼主
neauzhy 发表于 2010-4-1 20:11:29 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Summary
This report details Moody’s proposal to revise our rating methodology for assigning Bank Financial Strength Ratings
(BFSRs) globally.1 This revision does not change the main factors that Moody’s considers in rating banks. However,
the revised approach provides a single, global methodology instead of separate methodologies for mature and developing
markets. It also establishes specific ranges for each factor that relate to different rating categories. The updated
methodology is intended to provide investors and issuers with a transparent set of guidelines allowing them to better
understand our rating process and how we reach our decisions.
To this end, we have developed a rating scorecard that uses a common set of globally available financial metrics
together with key qualitative factors that Moody’s analysts consider critical in evaluating a bank’s intrinsic financial
strength and specific weights for each factor. This scorecard will be used by Moody’s analysts as the first step in determining
BFSRs. It should also enable investors and issuers to independently estimate a BFSR for most banks within two
notches. This report describes the scorecard and discusses some of its limitations as well as some of the further adjustments
that Moody’s analysts may employ in assigning BFSRs.
The revised methodology is also intended to improve the consistency of Moody’s BFSRs. As previously
announced, Moody’s intends to incorporate joint-default analysis (JDA) into our assessment of external support for
banks later this year.2 We believe the updated BFSR methodology will help ensure that existing BFSRs are indeed
“pure” measures of stand-alone financial strength and do not include external support. This is important in order to
avoid double counting external support when we implement JDA for banks. We are requesting comments because we
believe that the implementation of this methodology could lead to changes in the BFSRs for a significant number of
banks, although we do not expect most of those to exceed 2 notches.
Readers should note that this methodology is not an exhaustive treatment of every factor considered by Moody’s
in assigning bank financial strength ratings, but it should enable our constituents to better understand how and why we
arrive at a BFSR. Moody’s welcomes comments or suggestions on this proposal from market participants. Comments
should be sent to cpc@moodys.com by September 29, 2006.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:MOODY 穆迪评级 Mood 银行业 Participants 银行业 MOODY 穆迪 评级

BFSRScorecard.xls
下载链接: https://bbs.pinggu.org/a-590413.html

157.5 KB

需要: 8 个论坛币  [购买]

Banking.pdf

416.19 KB

沙发
lanalpha(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2010-4-1 20:17:16
这个也要钱啊,三大能公布出来的都不是什么重要的技术了。网上都能找到。
还在研究美国货币史

藤椅
neauzhy(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2010-4-1 22:26:00
二楼的,文章你在网上可以找到,可是哪张打分卡,在网上是找不到的。

板凳
zhangining(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2010-4-14 14:19:23
google  第一个就是。。。
3# neauzhy
从此不发收费帖!
欲省论坛币,请在论坛搜索“提供三个免费下研究报告的论坛和网站”

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-24 23:07