楼主: wenO6ZTcp8ct6
537 0

[英文文献] Impacts of Food Safety on U.S. Meat Demand [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

已卖:29份资源

初中生

95%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
510 个
通用积分
93.0717
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
330 点
帖子
11
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-16
最后登录
2020-9-16

楼主
wenO6ZTcp8ct6 发表于 2006-5-18 18:38:27 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Impacts of Food Safety on U.S. Meat Demand
英文文献作者:Piggott, Nicholas E.,Marsh, Thomas L.
英文文献摘要:
We investigate the impacts of food safety on a weakly separable U.S. meat demand system (beef, pork, and poultry) using both the Generalized Almost Ideal Demand System (GAIDS) and the Rotterdam model. To measure food safety, indices are constructed based on the number of meat safety articles reported by the top 50 English language newspapers. The GAIDS permits estimation of food safety parameters in a theoretically consistent framework using the concept of demographic translation. The Rotterdam model offers a comparison of estimates to the GAIDS and a further test of the robustness of the food safety elasticities. We find that inferences with respect to food safety and autocorrelation are fragile to functional form choices. From the models investigated there is mixed evidence as to whether food safety concerns have impacted demand. Evidence from the GAI model indicates that food safety impacts could last for several quarters, whereas evidence from the Rotterdam model fails to reject the hypothesis that food safety variables are statistically different from zero over any period. There is also mixed evidence concerning autocorrelation. In the GAI model the problem of autocorrelation disappears by including food safety variables, which are found to be statistically significant and seemingly rectifying the misspecified model that omits food safety variables. This is not the case for the Rotterdam model where a correction for serial correlation is needed even in the presence of the food safety variables, which themselves are not statistically significant. The fragility of these inferences and estimated economic effects to specification choices, particularly to functional form and how the food safety variables enter the demand functions, make it difficult to draw many definitive conclusions about the magnitude or sign of food safety impacts on demand. Concerns of their statistical significance notwithstanding, the most definitive observation is that they are likely to be very small relative to price and expenditure effects and to other possible factors that may have impacted demand.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-18 11:44