楼主: xzysdu
2097 5

[回归分析求助] 使用工具变量后,解释变量的系数更加显著,正常吗? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 2粉丝

VIP+

副教授

94%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
144883 个
通用积分
0.0172
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
1 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
4618 点
帖子
198
精华
0
在线时间
1902 小时
注册时间
2005-12-14
最后登录
2025-9-24

楼主
xzysdu 发表于 2021-12-26 12:08:09 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
如题,这种情况好像不常见,正常吗?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:工具变量 解释变量

沙发
ddx2009 发表于 2021-12-26 15:00:46
正常,文献中有不少这种情况,只要你能够给出合理的解释。

藤椅
黃河泉 在职认证  发表于 2021-12-26 18:15:25
根据 Wei Jiang (2017, Have Instrumental Variables Brought Us Closer to the Truth, Review of Corporate Finance Studies) 的文章:
  1. A survey of 255 papers that rely on the instrumental variable (IV) approach for identifying causal effects published in the “Big Three” finance journals reveals that IV estimates are larger than their corresponding uninstrumented estimates in about 80% of the studies, regardless of whether the potential endogeneity is expected to create a
  2. positive or negative bias based on economic reasoning. The magnitude of the IV estimates is, on average, nine times of that of the uninstrumented estimates even when economic insights do not suggest a downward bias of the latter. This study provides several explanations to the “implausibly large” IV estimates in finance research, and
  3. proposes best practices for identification-conscientious researchers.
复制代码

板凳
xzysdu 发表于 2021-12-26 20:07:43
黃河泉 发表于 2021-12-26 18:15
根据 Wei Jiang (2017, Have Instrumental Variables Brought Us Closer to the Truth, Review of Corporat ...
[em23][em23]

报纸
17779894882 发表于 2024-2-4 00:06:13
黃河泉 发表于 2021-12-26 18:15
根据 Wei Jiang (2017, Have Instrumental Variables Brought Us Closer to the Truth, Review of Corporat ...
谢谢您的回复!!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 10:32