发帖
雷达卡
摘要翻译：
在世界范围内，我们正经历着前所未有的生物多样性加速丧失，这是由生境破坏、环境污染和气候变化等一系列人为威胁引发的。尽管20年前由《生境指令》发起的欧洲生物多样性保护政策作出了一切努力，为建立Natura 2000网络提供了法律依据，但到2010年阻止欧洲生物多样性下降的目标仍未实现。霍奇基尔希等人。（2013,Conserv.Lett.6:462-467)指出了目前在执行指令方面存在的四个主要缺陷，即附件的优先次序、保护计划、调查系统和财政资源。然而，它们没有考虑到Natura2000网站的预期网络特征，这是相关性最高的一个方面。这封回应信处理了这一缺点，因为这是确保Natura 2020网络名符其实的先决条件，而不是任何其他战略。
---
英文标题：
《Accounting for the 'network' in the Natura 2000 network: A response to
Hochkirch et al. 2013》
---
作者：
Jan O. Engler, Anna F. Cord, Petra Dieker, J. Wolfgang Waegele, Dennis
Roedder
---
最新提交年份：
2014
---
分类信息：
一级分类：Quantitative Biology 数量生物学
二级分类：Other Quantitative Biology 其他定量生物学
分类描述：Work in quantitative biology that does not fit into the other q-bio classifications
不适合其他q-bio分类的定量生物学工作
--
---
英文摘要：
Worldwide, we are experiencing an unprecedented, accelerated loss of biodiversity triggered by a bundle of anthropogenic threats such as habitat destruction, environmental pollution and climate change. Despite all efforts of the European biodiversity conservation policy, initiated 20 years ago by the Habitats Directive that provided the legal basis for establishing the Natura 2000 network, the goal to halt the decline of biodiversity in Europe by 2010 has been missed. Hochkirch et al. (2013, Conserv. Lett. 6: 462-467) identified four major shortcomings of the current implementation of the directive concerning prioritization of the annexes, conservation plans, survey systems and financial resources. However they did not account for the intended network character of the Natura 2000 sites, an aspect of highest relevance. This response letter deals with this shortcoming as it is the prerequisite, over any other strategies, ensuring a Natura 2020 network being worth its name.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.7076
京公网安备 11010802022788号
