发帖
雷达卡
摘要翻译：
“毗连法则”是否适用于自由召回？我发现，在自由回忆中，条件反应概率通常被用作连续性的证据，但没有充分显示，限制了与最后一个回忆项目的距离，并且只在所有项目上平均。当充分展开X轴并分别检查所给项目列表的开始、中间和结束的条件响应概率时，我表明毗连定律只在局部适用，甚至有时也适用，并在全局范围内分解。
---
英文标题：
《Contiguity is limited in free recall》
---
作者：
Eugen Tarnow
---
最新提交年份：
2016
---
分类信息：
一级分类：Quantitative Biology 数量生物学
二级分类：Other Quantitative Biology 其他定量生物学
分类描述：Work in quantitative biology that does not fit into the other q-bio classifications
不适合其他q-bio分类的定量生物学工作
--
---
英文摘要：
Does the "law of contiguity" apply to free recall? I find that conditional response probabilities, often used as evidence for contiguity in free recall, have been displayed insufficiently, limiting the distance from the last item recalled, and only averaged over all items. When fully expanding the x-axis and examining the conditional response probabilities separately for the beginning, middle and end of the presented item list, I show that the law of contiguity applies only locally, even then only sometimes, and breaks down globally.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.05681
京公网安备 11010802022788号
