新冠肺炎检测的临床景观：艰难的选择

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

摘要翻译：
冠状病毒疾病2019（新冠肺炎）疫情在世界范围内迅速蔓延，导致大量人类死亡和经济损失。在制定明确的预防或治疗措施之前，关于检测、接触者追踪和隔离的政策仍然是遏制病毒传播的最佳公共卫生工具。检测是这些努力的一个关键组成部分，能够识别和隔离受感染的个人。测试方法、时间框架和结果的差异可能会对其整体效率、可用性和功效产生影响。在这个早期的草案中，我们比较了各种类型的诊断测试，包括PCR、抗原和家庭测试，以及它们的相对优势、劣势和用例。我们还研究了替代和非常规的方法。此外，我们分析了病毒及其测试对商业、政府法律、政策和医疗保健等各个垂直领域的短期和长期影响。
---
英文标题：
《Clinical Landscape of COVID-19 Testing: Difficult Choices》
---
作者：
Darshan Gandhi, Sanskruti Landage, Joseph Bae, Sheshank Shankar, Rohan
  Sukumaran, Parth Patwa, Sethuraman T V, Priyanshi Katiyar, Shailesh Advani,
  Rohan Iyer, Sunaina Anand, Aryan Mahindra, Rachel Barbar, Abhishek Singh,
  Ramesh Raskar
---
最新提交年份：
2020
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Quantitative Biology        数量生物学
二级分类：Other Quantitative Biology        其他定量生物学
分类描述：Work in quantitative biology that does not fit into the other q-bio classifications
不适合其他q-bio分类的定量生物学工作
--

---
英文摘要：
  The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread rapidly across the world, leading to enormous amounts of human death and economic loss. Until definitive preventive or curative measures are developed, policies regarding testing, contact tracing, and quarantine remain the best public health tools for curbing viral spread. Testing is a crucial component of these efforts, enabling the identification and isolation of infected individuals. Differences in testing methodologies, time frames, and outcomes can have an impact on their overall efficiency, usability and efficacy. In this early draft, we draw a comparison between the various types of diagnostic tests including PCR, antigen, and home tests in relation to their relative advantages, disadvantages, and use cases. We also look into alternative and unconventional methods. Further, we analyze the short-term and long-term impacts of the virus and its testing on various verticals such as business, government laws, policies, and healthcare.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.04202

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：Quantitative Conventional disadvantage QUANTITATIV differences 检测 新冠 功效 大量 tests