发帖
雷达卡
摘要翻译：
近日，法国参议院批准了一项法律，对一定规模以上的公司从数字服务中产生的收入征收3%的税。虽然关于这一行动的经济后果有很多政治辩论，但扭转这个问题实际上很有趣：我们考虑没有这种数字税的经济的长期影响。更一般地说，我们可以把数字服务看作是运输成本低或零的产品的特例。我们用基本的经济模型表明，一个没有运输成本的市场容易出现垄断，因为微小的、随机的质量差异会得到不成比例的回报。然后，我们提出了一种基于距离的税收，以抵消随机集中的趋势。与按物理（基数）距离扩展的税收不同，等级（序号）距离税在保持稳定经济的同时利用了数字化的好处。
---
英文标题：
《Ordinal Tax To Sustain a Digital Economy》
---
作者：
Nate Dwyer, Sandro Claudio Lera, Alex Sandy Pentland
---
最新提交年份：
2019
---
分类信息：
一级分类：Economics 经济学
二级分类：General Economics 一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类：Economics 经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--
---
英文摘要：
Recently, the French Senate approved a law that imposes a 3% tax on revenue generated from digital services by companies above a certain size. While there is a lot of political debate about economic consequences of this action, it is actually interesting to reverse the question: We consider the long-term implications of an economy with no such digital tax. More generally, we can think of digital services as a special case of products with low or zero cost of transportation. With basic economic models we show that a market with no transportation costs is prone to monopolization as minuscule, random differences in quality are rewarded disproportionally. We then propose a distance-based tax to counter-balance the tendencies of random centralisation. Unlike a tax that scales with physical (cardinal) distance, a ranked (ordinal) distance tax leverages the benefits of digitalization while maintaining a stable economy.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.03287
京公网安备 11010802022788号
