楼主: nongjing2012
6872 45

[财经英语角区] 20110706 Follow me 57 nongjing2012 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 1粉丝

副教授

6%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1518 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
57 点
热心指数
68 点
信用等级
59 点
经验
36249 点
帖子
810
精华
0
在线时间
569 小时
注册时间
2009-9-17
最后登录
2018-8-1

楼主
nongjing2012 发表于 2011-7-6 08:12:26 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Food Won’t Be Safe Unless Journalists Are
June 20, 2011
Original articlehttp://www.eeo.com.cn/ens/2011/0622/204409.shtml

Last week, the Ministry of Health said it plans to blacklist journalists who intentionally mislead the public about health concerns. The announcement shocked the media, who argue that newspapers are crucial in uncovering health scandals and that the blacklists could be used to obstruct investigative reporters and discredit their stories. Media commentator Bei Fangshuo calls for the government to rethink its proposals.

At a conference on food additives organized by the Department of Food Safety and the Ministry of Health, spokesman, Mao Qun’an, told journalists that the ministry plans to establish a “healthy platform for reporting” and create a more “healthy media” covering health. Journalists who spread incorrect information in order to mislead will be monitored and may be blacklisted.

Mao reminded the journalists that reports on food safety are hugely influential, telling them not to harm the nation’s development by mistakes and carelessness.

As spokesman for the Ministry of Health, it’s reasonable that Mao should want journalists to stick to the facts, but that ought to be the domain of journalist ethics. The media is scared and concerned by the idea of a blacklist.

If every ministry makes its own blacklist, it will be impossible for the public to hold them to account and the central governments proposal to promote public supervision of the government will be merely an empty promise. What frightens journalists is the presumption that they are to blame and that ministries are free to punish or reward them as they like. If, among existing newspapers, television channels, radio stations or websites, we want to choose some that enjoy spreading false information and misleading the public and label them as “unhealthy”, then we need to be very clear about the criteria. Otherwise, it’s not hard to imagine that the category will be used to block honest reporting of problems with food safety.

It’s well known that the main reason for problems with food safety is the aggressive cost cuts by businesses in search of greater profits, but the lack of public supervision is also a factor. The Ministry of Health’s planned blacklist shifts the responsibility for problems onto the media. It is as though the problems don’t originate within the food industry but because of the media.

This can hardly be the Ministry of Health’s intention and the blacklist is unlikely ever to appear, but we ought to take note of the relationship between public authorities and the media.

Recently, there have recently been a series of cases in which public authorities threatened the media. The most shocking occasion was when a county party secretary sent someone to Beijing to snatch a journalist’s Dictaphone. These cases reflect public authorities’ prejudices against the media. However these prejudices are being challenged as the media’s role in society grows and the authorities need a new understanding of the media – it’s society’s immune system, not its illness. As one discipline inspection commission secretary said before he was sentenced to death, “the media is the best guard against corruption.”

When a sick man keeps complaining about his immune system instead of going to hospital, his illness can’t be cured. Likewise, when journalists are not safe, the safety of food and even society cannot be guaranteed.

This article has been reworded and edited by Will Bland.
cite:What is the balance between the media and the public authorities?

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:follow G20 ING LOW relationship followme followus版

已有 8 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
mscontrol + 1 + 1 + 1 对论坛有贡献
心情晴朗 + 1 + 1 + 1 事实上我不是很赞同本文观点,看我回复··
dyalan + 1 + 1 + 1 对论坛有贡献
思念江南 + 1 + 1 奖励积极上传好的资料
whachel1976 + 1 + 1 + 1 大家都关心的话题。
zhengwenyi + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
bengdi1986 + 48 + 48 + 2 + 2 + 3 精彩帖子
eros_zz + 60 + 2 + 3 + 5 我很赞同

总评分: 经验 + 48  论坛币 + 108  学术水平 + 9  热心指数 + 11  信用等级 + 14   查看全部评分

循一而进

沙发
eros_zz 学生认证  发表于 2011-7-6 08:15:41
请大家积极为楼主评分

藤椅
zhengwenyi 在职认证  发表于 2011-7-6 08:25:45
stick to the facts...They are good actors、、、
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 热心积极!

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

被 酒 莫 惊 春 睡 重 ,赌 书 消 得 泼 茶 香

板凳
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-7-6 08:33:23
Yeah ,the journalists are the representatives of our public surpervision. It spreads the cultures and evaluate the government suffiency. However , it sometimes distort its functions and actions and is operated by other sections.
In a word ,I believe that  food won't be safe unless the journalists are.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 + 1 观点有启发

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

报纸
zhang533744 发表于 2011-7-6 08:36:46 来自手机
57,57卫生部门有点狗拿耗子多管闲事,要进行约束也应该是新闻部门内部的事,否则每个部门都约束,岂不乱套了啊。其实它的用意是好的,都是为了老百姓好,但是处理的方法不得当。
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 说得在理

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

地板
2441414 在职认证  发表于 2011-7-6 08:45:43
食物基本有毒。。。。
已有 1 人评分经验 学术水平 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 24 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 24  学术水平 + 1   查看全部评分

佛说:不可曰。

7
代号白头翁 发表于 2011-7-6 09:07:47
有媒体监督,未必能做到食品安全
没有媒体监督,必然食品不安全
已有 1 人评分经验 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 48 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 48   查看全部评分

8
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-7-6 09:11:09
Additionally , medias have many benifits for our society, we should take them objectively.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

9
nongjing2012 发表于 2011-7-6 09:26:29
7# 代号白头翁
食品安全,可有良策?
Whether there is a way to the Food security?
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 12 + 2 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 12  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

循一而进

10
nongjing2012 发表于 2011-7-6 09:32:13
6# 2441414
食物有毒,还是人心太毒?社会教育缺失的是否太多?
The society is poisonous in nature,so no to surprise that food is not safe for daily。Absence of common sense and general morality resulted in today‘s catastrophe.catastrophe.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 24 + 2 + 2 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 24  学术水平 + 2  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

循一而进

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-9 10:48