楼主: nongjing2012
6913 45

[财经英语角区] 20110706 Follow me 57 nongjing2012 [推广有奖]

21
eaglestar 在职认证  发表于 2011-7-6 14:15:54
54,54
In a word, we have lost trust in each other.
Trust shall be a basic line for people's connection and daily life. There are so many distorted stories in the society due to the lack of trust. If the journalists are safe, can we sure that the food will be safe if it was in the hand of some bad journalists? No, we can't. Hope that every journalist is a honest one is not a safe idea. So when we came back to the topic, what have caused the results? Food is the most important element in our daily life but now we have to worry what we eat, it's kind of joking, right? Thanks god, not every one is a bad guy, there is still hope that we can make this world a better place. Before that, there are so much to do.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 60 + 2 + 3 the best!

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 60  学术水平 + 2  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

22
whachel1976 发表于 2011-7-6 14:34:39
今天出现了三只新的小猫。呵呵。
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 够热心

总评分: 热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

23
nongjing2012 发表于 2011-7-6 14:44:39
14# wufei2134
依这么分析,还得扯出有效独立的第三方机构来监督。以目前砖家、公共事业团体水平来看,又有谁能承担呢?这个难题的解决,恐怕非一日之功。
Absence of ffectivethe  third party  operating agency ,who will undertake the food security responsibility?
循一而进

24
nongjing2012 发表于 2011-7-6 14:50:36
22# whachel1976
勿觑小猫,猫不惧虎!食品安全恰恰少了这样的几只小猫。呵呵
循一而进

25
思念江南 发表于 2011-7-6 16:19:21
reporters are “uncrowned kings”,  
The core of our appeal is freedom of speech.
TO stretch a rule do anything to harm the interests of the  most people.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

26
happylife87 发表于 2011-7-6 16:52:30
Journalists have their wrong-doings, but we still believe them in a certain degree. On the contrary, we do not believe some supervisors who say food is safe. The fact is that almost all that we eat is not guaranteed. Governors who don't do what they should do are not fined, but they use their powers to supress who tell the truth!
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 + 1 我很赞同

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

27
purplehairs 发表于 2011-7-6 16:58:00
Follow Me:54, 18
防民之口甚于防川。如果真没有问题还怕别人说么。卫生部不将精力集中在自己的该尽责任上,却总想着干这种掩耳盗铃的事。
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 + 1 在理

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

28
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-7-6 18:35:42
三个新猫,怎么个意思,百思不得其解! 22# whachel1976
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 问得好

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

29
nongjing2012 发表于 2011-7-6 19:02:56
26# happylife87
In my opinion,if we believe sth,sth will be bad.That is the core of our tragedy.Government、experts、charity,even human
Conscience ,which thing has not we believed?And what were the results?No believe,believe can be alive.
已有 2 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 很有道理!我们曾经都十分坚信过这些,但是我们一次次被伤害了!
bengdi1986 + 60 + 36 + 2 + 2 + 2 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 36  学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

循一而进

30
starskyjing 发表于 2011-7-6 19:13:50
46、46
a good article.
in my opinion  both sides have their faults. they didn't  master the accurate extent of their behaviors. the ministry should not take constraint ; the journalists should be responsible for their covers and insure its  authenticity not just  for  focus.
已有 2 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 12 鼓励积极发帖讨论
nongjing2012 + 1 + 1 + 1 观点有启发

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 12  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-1 17:10