楼主: bigfoot0518
1470 1

[外行报告] 摩根斯坦利:2012年5月中国对冲策略(免费) [推广有奖]

已卖:2563份资源

学术权威

70%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
10
论坛币
10441579 个
通用积分
7.0590
学术水平
1222 点
热心指数
923 点
信用等级
1220 点
经验
65985 点
帖子
2052
精华
21
在线时间
405 小时
注册时间
2008-12-11
最后登录
2021-8-16

楼主
bigfoot0518 发表于 2012-5-21 15:51:23 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
In the United States, portions of this report regarding non-US options are intended for Morgan Stanley’s Institutional Clients only.
+= Analysts employed by non-U.S. affiliates are not registered with FINRA, may not be associated persons of the member and may not be subject to NASD/NYSE restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
Hedging the uncertain tail risks in China: In this note we consider how to hedge portfolios against a Chinese hard landing. Using Morgan Stanley’s hard-landing scenarios, we look for the cheapest long-duration hedges with low mark-to-market in non- tail scenarios across equities, FX and credit.
We see the probability of a hard landing as low, but not low enough to make hedging costs irrelevant: China-related assets have increasingly been driven by fears of a hard landing and hopes of policy easing. As a team, we’re not in the hard-landing camp, but we also recognise that a hard landing would have major implications for global markets and particularly for the most China-sensitive assets in equities, credit and FX in Asia. On our estimates, markets are pricing in a 1-in-10 chance of a hard landing in China in the coming twelve months, more in equities, less in FX markets.
How we compare hedges across FX, credit and equities: For a hedge to be worthwhile paying for against a low-probability event, it needs to be ‘cheap’. This is where the value lies in looking beyond a single asset class. Our approach to comparing tail hedges across very different assets is to evaluate the reward/risk based on our team’s fundamental ‘hard- landing price scenarios’.
FX and credit: the best China hedges across all assets: Our preferred hedges are those markets that price in the least hard-landing risk. FX puts (CNY and TWD in particular) and CDS (China sovereign in particular) look most compelling on our analysis, with equity hedges generally more expensive, even though they’re moderately cheaper than at the start of the year. ASX200 puts are the most cost-effective equity hedge.
What the numbers don’t capture: Screening for cheap hedges based on ‘hard-landing scenarios’ may feel like a nice way of transgressing the asset classes, but there are important caveats to consider. For instance, we can easily identify risks with using both CNY FX puts or China sovereign CDS.

2012-05-18_摩根士丹利亚洲_The China Hedge – May 2012.pdf (220.54 KB)


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:摩根斯坦利 根斯坦利 摩根斯坦 摩根斯 斯坦利 策略 免费 摩根斯坦利 中国

已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
arthistory4 + 20 + 3 + 3 + 3 对论坛有贡献

总评分: 论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

沙发
江左鱼肠 发表于 2012-5-21 15:53:10
好      !

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 23:14