请选择 进入手机版 | 继续访问电脑版
楼主: bigfoot0518
2330 8

[其他] 摩根大通:2012年6月中国宏观经济研究报告(免费) [推广有奖]

学术权威

70%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
10
论坛币
10441579 个
通用积分
6.7997
学术水平
1222 点
热心指数
923 点
信用等级
1220 点
经验
65985 点
帖子
2052
精华
21
在线时间
405 小时
注册时间
2008-12-11
最后登录
2021-8-16

bigfoot0518 发表于 2012-6-14 15:48:14 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
MSCI China’s trailing PE of 9 is lowest of the major EMs. It is not rated
as a growth market. This is rational. The three inflection points for its
economy and returns are demographic, 2008/9 stimulus and June 2011
peak in the property market bubble.
 Japan’s and Taiwan’s late ’80s bubbles are good analogies. Both
countries had excess savings (large current account surplus), momentum
in equity and property markets plus demographic challenge. Unlike the
Western property bubbles, household leverage was modest. But credit to
GDP was high. Equity markets peaked three to four years prior to
property prices. Equity valuations corrected faster than property prices.
The deflation in property prices was a multiyear event.
 The post bubble period in Japan and Taiwan for equities investors was
challenging, characterized by a self defeating market timing herd. The
track record of H and A-shares is poor. Both Chinese savers and the
government need an equity investment culture.
 All is not lost. The deflation in Chinese equity valuations was rapid.
Even if economic growth slows to 3-6% it will still be higher than EM
average, let alone DM. We believe modest changes in governance,
particularly a progressive dividend policy, can convert a trading market
into a destination for long term savings. The fiscal burden will grow due
to an ageing population, slower growth and the need to subsidize low
return assets. Privatization of SoEs could help this but only if there are
local and international investors willing to buy.
 On pages 7 to 12, we compare monetary, economic and market
characteristics of Japan, Taiwan and China. The time period is 10 years
around the equity market bubble. Property price appreciation in China
was faster. Chinese apartment prices are a third of Japan’s but per capita
GDP was a tenth of Japan’s at the bubble!

2012-06-13_J.P摩根证券亚洲_China challenged:Lessons from other Asian bubbles.pdf (1.44 MB)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:宏观经济研究 中国宏观经济 研究报告 经济研究 宏观经济 challenge property 摩根大通 经济研究 account

zpjzpj 发表于 2012-6-15 10:29:26 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢支持免费

使用道具

素面 发表于 2012-7-5 16:06:45 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢啊,纯英文!!

使用道具

好有难度啊,挑战

使用道具

谢谢!!

使用道具

1019349680 发表于 2012-7-11 10:09:13 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
汗···············

使用道具

huhu0429 发表于 2012-7-11 11:13:25 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
英文的啊。。。。

使用道具

lgqnryx 发表于 2012-8-18 11:14:48 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
支持免费!

使用道具

yeks727 发表于 2012-10-17 11:01:50 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
thanks for sharing

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-3-29 13:41