楼主: 风鸟院花月
3761 16

[宏观经济指标] Is the trade deficit bad? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

初中生

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
59 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
132 点
帖子
15
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2007-5-22
最后登录
2007-6-21

楼主
风鸟院花月 发表于 2007-5-23 12:23:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
<P><FONT color=#1a1ae6 size=4>Is the trade deficit bad?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#1a1ae6 size=4>贸易赤字是好是坏?</FONT></P>

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-24 21:42:00编辑过]

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Deficit Trade BAD CIT The 贸易赤字 trade

沙发
风鸟院花月 发表于 2007-5-24 21:43:00
为什么没人理偶?~~~~
只想... 简单的生活......

藤椅
古风莫逆 发表于 2007-5-25 00:28:00

Let me try to give you a brief explanation.

In my opinion, trade deficit is not that bad. It is quite neutral. It is not as most people might originally think that the country is losing money.

You can analysize in this way:

You buy imports with currency issued by your own government. Where can the currency finally be? The currency can flow back as a foreign investment, or be used to buy exports from your country, or just be kept by someone else for future use. Each way is not that bad to your country.

If you learned some macroeconomics, I'd like to give you some formulas to remind you the relation above:

In the balance sheet of an open economy:

current account = - financial account

current account = net exports (about to be equal)

financial account = - net foreign investment (Notice here: NFI is defined as the difference between the cash flows out of your country and the cash flows in)

That is to say that:

net export = net foreign investment!

This is just a brief model and some of my analysis.

板凳
风鸟院花月 发表于 2007-5-26 01:55:00

能解释下么?虽然有看英文版....但是....- -///

只想... 简单的生活......

报纸
qweqww 发表于 2007-5-26 09:49:00
假设完全理性,那么按照比较优势就没什么坏处,只不过时跨期优化的某种结果而已,但是在有限理性下,会出现局部最优不等于全局最优的情况,问题时由于分析人也是有限理性,能不能改变是值得怀疑

地板
风鸟院花月 发表于 2007-5-26 23:37:00
楼上的..- -讲了什么?~.....
只想... 简单的生活......

7
古风莫逆 发表于 2007-5-26 23:47:00

He means that if all the coutries are rational, they will recognize the benefits resulted from the comparative advantages. Then they are willing to specialize in their specific comparative advantages. It will help both to live better.

If those countires are not all rational, there might be cases that the partially best solution is not a perfact one for the whole. (to qweqww: Could you give us some examples?)

For the last sentence, I'm not quite clear for its meaning.I hope he can explain it more clearly.

8
vicvic 发表于 2007-5-27 01:54:00

以美国为例

跟中国的巨额贸易逆差,说明本国制造业受到打击,但另一方面却降低了通胀率。

所以没有绝对好,没有绝对不好,2 sides

9
古风莫逆 发表于 2007-5-27 13:55:00

There is one thing I want to mention. The US is a very particular case in the international financial market. Due to the preponderance of US dollar as a major media for exchange, all the countries is sharing the risk for the appreciation or deflation of the US dollar.

As a result, it helps to reduce the risk of the US to have inflation.

10
vicvic 发表于 2007-5-27 16:52:00
我只是举个例子来说明贸易赤字并不一定都是坏事,这个不也是lz想知道的吗

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 05:26