楼主: Trevor
1869 0

Issue Regarding Cross-classification? [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 4粉丝

已卖:1100份资源

副教授

26%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

Probability NewOccidental

RapidMiner NewOccidental

Machine Learning

威望
1
论坛币
3509 个
通用积分
0.7297
学术水平
25 点
热心指数
17 点
信用等级
24 点
经验
5225 点
帖子
412
精华
2
在线时间
176 小时
注册时间
2005-5-4
最后登录
2024-4-7

楼主
Trevor 发表于 2014-1-2 06:47:23 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Hi, everybody


I am working with student survey data and wondering if anyone had any advice for dealing with data that is cross-classified but with only one unit per crossed pair. Students in my dataset were surveyed once in multiple classrooms (the average is about twice, range 1 to 8), classrooms are nested in teachers, and teachers in schools.


I was hoping to model my dependent variable, which is specific to the classroom a student was surveyed in, using three level models of studentsXclassrooms at level one, teachers at level two, and schools at level three. However, I only have one observation per studentXclassroom pair and my models are having difficulty converging. (They converge fine when I limit the data set to one school and a very small number of observations, but my actual data set is huge). I have read several studies on the consequences of ignoring cross-classification and was hoping someone point me to studies evaluatingany alternatives, especially when there is just one observation per crossed pair? Also, I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this potential work around: give each studentXclassroom pair an id variable, nest this pseudo-level in teachers, and include a fixed dummy variable for each classroom at level one?


Thanks so much for your help!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:regarding cation regard issue Cross multiple specific teachers crossed schools

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-1 08:56