楼主: ReneeBK
1550 1

Multilevel data with correlation within subjects [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 62粉丝

VIP

已卖:4900份资源

学术权威

14%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

R资源总汇

Panel Data Analysis

Experimental Design

威望
1
论坛币
49655 个
通用积分
55.9937
学术水平
370 点
热心指数
273 点
信用等级
335 点
经验
57805 点
帖子
4005
精华
21
在线时间
582 小时
注册时间
2005-5-8
最后登录
2023-11-26

楼主
ReneeBK 发表于 2014-4-13 11:39:19 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

I have a dataset with 1206 deputies from two different chambers (1998 and 2002, respectively). In addition, there are 18 parties, and some deputies are in both chambers (the ones who were reelected). I am interested in the relation between party discipline (in a scale from 0 to 100) and the probability of geting appointed as party leader (0 or 1), but I am also interested in separate estimates for each party.

A classmate told me that the following mixed effect model would be appropriate, but I don't know what to do with the correlation within subjects:

model <- glmer(leader ~ discipline + (1 + discipline|chamber:party),                data, family=binomial)

What is the structure of these data and which model would be appropriate in this case (using R)?




二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:correlation Multilevel relation subjects Subject discipline interested different appointed following

沙发
ReneeBK 发表于 2014-4-13 11:40:12
Gelman and Hill (2007) say that there is nothing wrong with having groups with few individuals (even when there is only one). But I am not sure whether I can add an intercept for the deputies or not.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 03:59