楼主: ReneeBK
1686 0

[问答] Replicate an Analysis Using SPSS Mixed Procedure? [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 62粉丝

VIP

已卖:4897份资源

学术权威

14%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

R资源总汇

Panel Data Analysis

Experimental Design

威望
1
论坛币
49635 个
通用积分
55.6937
学术水平
370 点
热心指数
273 点
信用等级
335 点
经验
57805 点
帖子
4005
精华
21
在线时间
582 小时
注册时间
2005-5-8
最后登录
2023-11-26

楼主
ReneeBK 发表于 2014-5-14 01:55:59 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
I am trying to replicate an analysis done by a colleague (who used a different program for data analysis), and I believe that using a mixed model is the best way to handle the data. However, I'm unfamiliar with using mixed models and I'm getting an error every time I run the analysis. I imagine this is because the model is overspecified, but I'm not sure what I'm doing
wrong. I included my syntax at the end of the message.

The experimental design is like this: I have one variable, subjects, that I want to include as a random factor. The subjects saw letter strings on a computer screen and had to decide whether the string was a word or non-word. I have two within-subjects factors: "wordness" (whether the string was a word or non-word) and "relatedness" (whether the string was related to
another stimuli on the screen or unrelated). Together, I think, this forms a nested repeated measures design. The dependent variable is reaction time.

Here is my syntax for this model:
MIXED Rt2Adj_mean BY Relatedness Wordness Subj
   /CRITERIA=CIN(95) MXITER(100) MXSTEP(10) SCORING(1)
SINGULAR(0.000000000001) HCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE) LCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE)
PCONVERGE(0.000001, ABSOLUTE)
   /FIXED=Relatedness Wordness Relatedness*Wordness | SSTYPE(3)
   /METHOD=ML
   /PRINT=DESCRIPTIVES
   /RANDOM=Subj | COVTYPE(VC)
   /REPEATED=Relatedness*Wordness | SUBJECT(Subj) COVTYPE(UN).


I've also tried it with this slight adjustment, adding the intercept as a
random effect (which I think may be more correct?)
MIXED Rt2Adj_mean BY Relatedness Wordness Subj
   /CRITERIA=CIN(95) MXITER(100) MXSTEP(10) SCORING(1)
SINGULAR(0.000000000001) HCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE) LCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE)
PCONVERGE(0.000001, ABSOLUTE)
   /FIXED=Relatedness Wordness Relatedness*Wordness | SSTYPE(3)
   /METHOD=ML
   /PRINT=DESCRIPTIVES
   /RANDOM=INTERCEPT Subj | COVTYPE(VC)
   /REPEATED=Relatedness*Wordness | SUBJECT(Subj) COVTYPE(UN).



Either way, when I run the analysis, I get the following error: "Warnings Iteration was terminated but convergence has not been achieved. The MIXED procedure continues despite this warning. Subsequent results produced are based on the last iteration. Validity of the model fit is uncertain." Output is produced, but it doesn't come close to the the output I should be getting
that was produced by my colleague. I am wondering if the error is due to specifying subjects as a random effect but also as a subjects variable (using the GUI). However, I'm not sure how to get around this, as I do need
subjects to be a random effect.

It seems like this should be a simple enough design to analyze but I think my unfamiliarity with mixed models is causing me to run into problems. I've been trying to read up on them, but nothing has jumped out at me as a solution (although I do think that overspecification is potentially my problem). Any help would be greatly appreciated!

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:replicate Procedure Analysis Analysi replica different subjects included message believe

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注cda
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-30 19:37