楼主: jpld
1866 0

[学习分享] R Programming week 3-Debugging [推广有奖]

  • 2关注
  • 50粉丝

已卖:4份资源

讲师

2%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1264 个
通用积分
9.5333
学术水平
120 点
热心指数
120 点
信用等级
99 点
经验
1249 点
帖子
192
精华
0
在线时间
271 小时
注册时间
2009-5-29
最后登录
2024-6-25

楼主
jpld 发表于 2015-4-23 20:53:24 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

Something’s Wrong!

Indications that something’s not right

message: A generic notification/diagnostic message produced by the message function;execution of the function continues

warning: An indication that something is wrong but not necessarily fatal; execution of thefunction continues; generated by the warning function

error: An indication that a fatal problem has occurred; execution stops; produced by the stop function

condition: A generic concept for indicating that something unexpected can occur; programmers can create their own conditions

How do you know that something is wrong with your function?

What was your input?

How did you call the function?

What were you expecting? Output, messages, other results?

What did you get?

How does what you get differ from what you were expecting?

Were your expectations correct in the first place?

Can you reproduce the problem (exactly)?

Debugging Tools in R

The primary tools for debugging functions in R are:

traceback: prints out the function call stack after an error occurs; does nothing if there’s no error

debug: flags a function for “debug” mode which allows you to step through execution of a functionone line at a time

browser: suspends the execution of a function wherever it is called and puts the function indebug mode

trace: allows you to insert debugging code into a function a specific places

recover: allows you to modify the error behavior so that you can browse the function call stack

These are interactive tools specifically designed to allow you to pick through a function. There’s alsothe more blunt technique of inserting print/cat statements in the function.

traceback

> lm(y ~ x)

Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object ’y’ not found

> traceback()

7: eval(expr, envir, enclos)

6: eval(predvars, data, env)

5: model.frame.default(formula = y ~ x, drop.unused.levels = TRUE)

4: model.frame(formula = y ~ x, drop.unused.levels = TRUE)

3: eval(expr, envir, enclos)

2: eval(mf, parent.frame())

1: lm(y ~ x)

debug

> debug(lm)

> lm(y ~ x)

debugging in: lm(y ~ x)

debug: {

ret.x <- x

ret.y <- y

cl <- match.call()

...

if (!qr)

z$qr <- NULL

z

}

Browse[

2]>

Browse[2]> n

debug: ret.x <- x

Browse[2]> n

debug: ret.y <- y

Browse[2]> n

debug: cl <- match.call()

Browse[2]> n

debug: mf <- match.call(expand.dots = FALSE)

Browse[2]> n

debug: m <- match(c("formula", "data", "subset", "weights", "na.action",

"offset"), names(mf), 0L)

recover

> options(error = recover)

> read.csv("nosuchfile")

Error in file(file, "rt") : cannot open the connection

In addition: Warning message:

In file(file, "rt") :

cannot open file ’nosuchfile’: No such file or directory

Enter a frame number, or 0 to exit

1: read.csv("nosuchfile")

2: read.table(file = file, header = header, sep = sep, quote = quote, dec =

3: file(file, "rt")

Selection:

Summary

There are three main indications of a problem/condition: message, warning, error- only an error is fatal

When analyzing a function with a problem, make sure you can reproduce the problem, clearly state your expectations and how the output differs from your expectation

Interactive debugging tools traceback, debug, browser, trace, and recover can be used to find problematic code in functions

Debugging tools are not a substitute for thinking!

欢迎关注:


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Programming Debugging Program debug gram unexpected generated execution something function

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注cda
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 13:01