楼主: pg_yp
1616 1

[程序化交易] 关于PE你应该知道的 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:76份资源

高中生

37%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
12 个
通用积分
0.1200
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
153 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
51 小时
注册时间
2016-2-15
最后登录
2021-10-11

楼主
pg_yp 发表于 2017-3-11 10:35:08 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Forward vs. Trailing P/E Ratios

Forward vs Trailing P E ratios.pdf (76.4 KB, 需要: 1 个论坛币)

Value investors like to sort stocks by trailing P/E ratios and
focus only on the lowest P/E quartile as they believe that stocks that have low valuations in relation to
trailing earnings, on average, outperform high P/E stocks. Other investors, however, like to use forward
P/E ratios to identify outperforming stocks going forward. But which metric has a better predictive power
as far as stock returns are concerned, trailing or forward P/E ratios? Do low P/E quartile stocks yield
higher or lower return visavis
high P/E quartile stocks when P/E is defined based on trailing or forward
earnings? There is no doubt that low P/E stocks (however defined) beat high P/E stocks. Evidence in this
regard is overwhelming. Low P/E stocks outperform high P/E stocks by between 6% and 13% depending
on the country. This outperformance, on average, holds steady over different time periods, as well as
during recoveries/recessions and bear/bull markets. Nevertheless, there is no much evidence as to which
stocks do better, those that have low forward P/E or low trailing P/E.


历史PE与预测PE哪一个更靠谱 看完这篇论文你就知道了
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:performance Outperform Performing Recessions Predictive

已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
fantuanxiaot + 33 + 33 精彩帖子

总评分: 经验 + 33  论坛币 + 33   查看全部评分

沙发
钱学森64(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2017-3-11 10:37:24
谢谢分享

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-28 15:54