楼主: jo2010
1631 3

[问答] What's the advantage of Eviews and Stata respectively? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

小学生

92%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
10 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
125 点
帖子
16
精华
0
在线时间
4 小时
注册时间
2010-1-4
最后登录
2013-9-11

楼主
jo2010 发表于 2010-1-4 15:37:26 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
I am trying to do some Econometrics (such as svar and cross section data) for my research and need to choose a program. Which program is better? Thanks!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:respectively advantage respect EVIEWS Views EVIEWS Stata What advantage respectively

回帖推荐

nazikhan 发表于4楼  查看完整内容

From My experience, To perform SVAR analyis, both Eviews and Stata are fine. However, You may not able to produce error band using Eviews, which is pretty easy to do it using Stata. But I don't like the way how stata deal with time series data. P. S. It is very difficult to publish your paper or answer external examiner if you do not produce error band for your IRF. It is like you run regressio ...

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
ermutuxia 发表于 2010-1-4 17:11:37
the Answer Of the question depends on what paragram do you want to write.

藤椅
jo2010 发表于 2010-1-12 15:46:11
Thanks for the answer. I want to perform a structural VAR on the cross sectional data.

板凳
nazikhan 发表于 2010-1-12 16:08:33
From My experience, To perform SVAR analyis, both Eviews and Stata are fine. However, You may not able to produce error band using Eviews, which is pretty easy to do it using Stata. But I don't like the way how stata deal with time series data.

P. S. It is very difficult to publish your paper or answer external examiner if you do not produce error band for your IRF. It is like you run regression without  reporting standard error or t-statistics.

I prefere RATS to others for time series analysis.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
胖胖小龟宝 + 10 + 10 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 经验 + 10  论坛币 + 10   查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-31 13:32