翻译求助 （奖励论坛币50）

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

Hence there is a discrepancy between the true preferences of agents and the
preferences of the hypothetical representative consumer genera'tin s aggregate
fluctuations. In particular, the second of these has preferences linear in n,
indicating a higher dasticity of labor supply.
Hansen (1985) has shown that this feature has implications .~hieh are
empirically relevant. Whereas many other individuals have found that movements
in aggregate hours are too small relative to movements in reai wages of
productivity, Hansen's indivisible labor economy delivers too much mevemmt
in aggregate hours relative to real wages and productivity. It is important to
know that the results of this paper do net depend critically upon the
assumption of identical agents. It may be thought that having all agents
simultaneously being indifferent between working and not working is what
causes the large response in employment relative to productivity. A paranietric
example is offered to illustrate that heterogeneity need not affect the results of
this paper. The important feature of the example is that each ag¢ut has a
different reservation wage. Consider the following specification: there is a
continuum of agents with total mass equal to one. Each agent has a utility
function of the form

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：论坛币 Productivity Fluctuations SIMULTANEOUS Implications 论坛 求助 翻译 奖励

因此，参与人（agents）的偏好和假设的产生总体波动的代表性消费者的偏好有差异。
实际上，后者有着关于n的线性偏好，说明着劳动力供给有着更高的弹性。
Hansen（1985年的文章）已经说明这些特征有着某种影响，但是在实际中可以忽略。
然而，许多人发现总时间的变化量与生产力、真实工资的变化相比太小了，Hansen不可分劳动经济产生了过多总时间上的变化。很重要的一点是，我们注意到这篇论文的结果并不依赖于同质参与人的假设。假定所有参与人同时对就业和失业无差异偏好，很有可能被认为是造成就业率比生产有着更大的波动的原因。给出的一个具体参数的例子说明了参与人的异质性并不影响这篇论文的结果。这个例子的突出特征就是，假设每个参与人有着不同的保留工资。考虑下面这种情况：有一个参与人的连续统，他们总量为1.每个参与人都有这样的效用函数：

请楼主过目，觉得好就鼓励下，给点论坛币吧，呵呵

请先把内容核对一下。。。