Baidu(BIDU.US)History repeats itself

发布:CapitalVue数据库 | 分类:研报下载

关于本站

人大经济论坛-经管之家:分享大学、考研、论文、会计、留学、数据、经济学、金融学、管理学、统计学、博弈论、统计年鉴、行业分析包括等相关资源。
经管之家是国内活跃的在线教育咨询平台!

报告名称:Baidu(BIDU.US)Historyrepeatsitself报告类型:海外市场报告日期:2016-05-12研究机构:中金公司页数:7简介:WhathappenedInthisreportweadddetailstoourlastnoteontheregulationoverBaidu’sadpractices ...
数据分析师
Baidu(BIDU.US)History repeats itself

报告名称:Baidu(BIDU.US)History repeats itself
报告类型:海外市场
报告日期:2016-05-12
研究机构:中金公司
页数:7
简介:What happened
In this report we add details to our last note on theregulation over Baidu’s ad practices. A similar caseoccurred in 2008, when its share price -28% vs. the market afterits first day slump; Baidu cut its revenue guidance by ~15%,followed by a +12% correction over the next two weeks. Thistime, its share price lost -8% (excl. first day slump), we thinkS-T risks still exist until more certainty is provided.
Comments
Our last note’s 5% revenue impact assumption comesfrom: 1) ~25% revenue contribution from medical search, while15~20% involved with questionable hospitals; thus 4~5%impact on search; 2) enhanced weight of “credibility” and“reputation” in ranking have limited impact on revenue, as CTRand click no. can affect these two parameters; 3) impact fromimposed ad load limited: mobile not exposed, while PC may behurt by 5%, as prior limit held at 40%, thus impact for searchrevenue is 5%*40%=2%. Thus it adds a 6%~7% impact onsearch, and 5~6% on search + union, i.e. 4~5% impact on topline as search + union accounts for ~80% of Baidu’s revenue.Thus, 2Q revenue hurt by 3~4%, and a 4~5% reduction from3Q; bottom line of search hurt by 4~5% in 2Q and 5~7% from3Q, as fixed costs cannot be cut and this will exaggerate theeffect on bottom line.
However, in Baidu’s case, our last note neglected the demandfactor, which means China’s medical service industry may besubject to rectification, which could lead to a drop in advertisingdemand across the whole industry, not just the ones that need tobe ruled out. In that case, Baidu’s revenue guidance mightbe impacted (similar to December 2008), as its revenuemight be subject to a ~10% impact (thus 7% over thefull quarter). Baidu cut its guidance ~15% in December 2008,but search accounted for >95% of its revenue back then.
There are concerns over whether Baidu’s onlinemarketing will be classified as online ads– which requirean ICP license and ensure ad content’s fairness andaccuracy–which we think is overdue. Major Internetplayers (BABA, WUBA, etc.) are in a similar situation to Baidu,thus new regulations may have impact across entire Internetindustry. Although we cannot completely rule out this possibility,it could be an industry-level risk if it actually takes place.



本文关键词: Baidu(BIDU.US)History repeats itself  
1.凡人大经济论坛-经管之家转载的文章,均出自其它媒体或其他官网介绍,目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和其真实性负责;
2.转载的文章仅代表原创作者观点,与本站无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,本站对该文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性,不作出任何保证或承若;
3.如本站转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者及时联系本站,我们会及时处理。