发帖
雷达卡
<FONT size=3>计量经济学方法是早期产业组织理论的主要研究方法；即使在博弈论方法甚为流行的今天，产业组织理论的经验研究还是要靠计量经济学方法。
对于产业组织理论的几种主要研究方法，10年前曾经有人做过一项调查，也许能够大体上反映研究方法的现状。
我们这里就不进行方法论之争了，就象胡适所说的“多研究点问题，少谈点主义”；提出这个问题以及推荐一些相关资源的目的，主要是为了使大家在学习了产业组织理论的基本内容后，能够大体知道如何进行实际研究，也就是提供点研究工具。当然就象主题所表明的那样，我们这里讨论如何更好地使用计量经济学方法进行产业组织理论研究，关于博弈论方法和试验经济学方法，我们分别有主题进行讨论。
贴出这个主题的一个背景就是，任何产业组织理论教材、专著都没有指点我们如何进行经验研究，而只是告诉我们经验研究的一些结论，或介绍经验研究的进展，比如Emprical Industrial Organization课程。
产业组织理论的博弈化、理论化使的这个问题变的更为明显；我们并不主张对产业组织理论进行比较严格的理论和经验划分，需要指出的是，现在产业组织理论的经验研究和理论研究已经更多地融合在一起了，产业组织理论的研究人员也不象过去那样经验和理论（阵营）分明了。
第一个并不代表是最好的，当然也不是最差的；只是凑巧看到它罢了。
产业组织的计量经济学方法
CHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
COURSE DEscriptION FOR 2334: Econometrics of Industrial Organization – 10 ECTS
COURSE CODE N 2334
COURSE NAME: Econometrics of Industrial Organization
COURSE LEVEL: Optional project-based MSc course
ECTS CREDITS: 10
APPROVED: Approval by the Study Board on 19 Oct. 2004
SEMESTER FOR WHICH THE COURSE DEscriptION APPLIES: Spring 2005
REPLACES COURSE DEscriptION DATED: New
INTERVALS AT WHICH THE COURSE IS OFFERED: See course plan
FILLED IN BY: Svend Hylleberg / Henning Bunzel
LECTURERS: Svend Hylleberg / Hening Bunzel
TEACHING LANGUAGE: English
FORM OF ASSESSMENT: Oral examination based on the project
EXAMINATION AIDS ALLOWED: The project
NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK: 4 lectures per week in 6 weeks followed by
project work
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The first half part of the course is a 5 ECTS course entitled “The Econometrics of
Industrial Organization”
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
Industrial organization is a growing field of economics. It has gone from a small area
in economics to be a very important subject. Industrial organization is concerned
with the working of markets, especially the way firms compete with each other. In
order to provide an empirical underpinning of the theories in i ndustrial organization,
and in order to apply the results on practical day to day economic policies such as
regulations, monopoly control, merger control etc. it is necessary to further develop
the econometrics of Industrial organization.
The objective of the course is to present some of the recent results in the
econometrics of Industrial organization, and thereby make it possible for the students
with a broad area of interests within economics, finance, marketing and strategy to
evaluate and perform empirical studies within the subject area.
COURSE CONTENTS AND SUBJECT AREAS:
1. Introduction
2. Structural econometric modeling within industrial organization
3. Area 1: The Nordic electricity market
4. Area 2: The telecommunication market
5. Area 3. The automobile market
REQUIRED COURSES:
Micro 2 and Econometrics 2
COMPLEMENTARY COURSES:
TEACHING METHOD:
Lectures and project work in groups
LITERATURE:
Peter C. Reiss and Frank A. Wolak,2001, “Structural Econometric Modeling:
Rationales and Examples from Industrial Organisations”, Handbook of Econometrics,
Volume 6, paper, Downloadable from<IMG src="http://www.beiwang.com/a/images/pic/url.gif" align=absMiddle></FONT><a href="http://www.stanford.edu/~wolak/" target="_blank" ><FONT size=3>http://www.stanford.edu/~wolak/</FONT></A><FONT size=3>, 158 pages
Svend Hylleberg, 2004, “On the Exploitation of Market Power in the Nordic Electricity
Markets. The case of Elsam”. Working paper 2004-5 Department of Economics,
University of Aarhus, 22 pages.
B. Curtis Eaton and Richard G. Lipsey, 1989. “Production Differentiation”, chapter 12
in: Handbook of Industrial Organization, volume 1, eds. R. Schmalensee and
R.D.Willig.
Farid Gasmi, D. Mark Kennet, Jean-Jacques Laffont and William W. Sharkey, 2003
Cost Proxy Models and telecommunications Policy, MIT press, ISBN 0-262-07237-8.
100 pages
Niels Haldrup and Morten &Oslash;.Nielsen, 2004, “A Regime Switching Long Memory
Model for Electricity” . . Working paper 2004-2 Department of Economics, University
of Aarhus, 30 pages.
Frode Steen, 2003, “Do Bottleneck Generate Market Power? An Empirical Study of
the Norwegian Electricity Market” Discussion Paper 26/03 Department of Economics,
NHH Bergen, 28 pages
这里值得注意的是下面两篇文献：
1、来自计量经济学手册第6卷：结构计量经济模型：来自产业组织的理论和案例，作者Peter C. Reiss and Frank A. Wolak,2001,
2、产业组织理论手册的第12章：产品差异化，B. Curtis Eaton and Richard G. Lipsey, 1989.
前者可以从网上免费得到，后者就只能自己去图书馆复印了；毕竟目前我也没有设备，否则我定扫描上来给大家！
经验产业组织的最新发展，1994
Recent Developments in Empirical Industrial Organization
Author: Robert H. Porter (Northwestern University)
Journal of Economic Education Volume 25, No. 2，Issue: Spring 1994
Abstract: This article provides an annotated bibliography of recent empirical research in industrial organization, with emphasis on material subsequent to that covered by the Handbook of Industrial Organization. This article is divided into seven sections, covering: production, technology, and industry structure; the economics of markets with imperfect competition; entry, exit, and industry evolution; industry studies of regulation; auction markets; technical change and innovation; and organizations. In each section, recent developments are briefly highlighted.
修正一下一楼的一些看法，Empirical Industrial Organization的内容是我们致力于介绍的；因为这方面的内容更多的是从一些基准模型出发，通过放松一些假设或条件来进行研究的；计量经济学方法在产业组织理论中的应用也主要是通过他们来体现的。
最近的一本关于经验产业组织研究的论文集是Williamson领衔编辑的一本，2004出版，一直没有去借来复印！
说到经验研究，我就想一篇利用经验数据，进行美国煤炭市场契约长度和宽度研究的文章，分析出方位的差异（跟煤炭主产区的距离）、密西西比河、五大湖等对煤炭市场契约的长度、宽度的影响，以及契约参与方如何利用契约结构来形成或使用市场力量。
当时我就想，是否俺也用中国煤炭市场的数据来分析中国煤炭契约的长度、宽度，及价格形成（结算）机制，以及经常使用的煤炭订货会、春节、河流、气候、煤炭产区分布等对煤炭市场契约的影响，起码能复制一篇好的论文，检验一下理论模型，好的话还能发现新的东西呢！
Common Sense and Simplicity in Empirical Industrial Organization
Ariel Pakes
http://www.nber.org/papers/W10154
NBER Working Paper No. w10154
Issued in December 2003
This paper is a revised version of a keynote address delivered at the inaugural International Industrial Organization Conference in Boston, April 2003. I argue that new econometric tools have facilitated the estimation of models with realistic theoretical underpinnings, and because of this, have made empirical I.O. much more useful. The tools solve computational problems thereby allowing us to make the relationship between the economic model and the estimating equations transparent. This, in turn, enables us to utilize the available data more effectively. It also facilitates robustness analysis and clarifies the assumptions needed to analyze the causes of past events and/or make predictions of the likely impacts of future policy or environmental changes. The paper provides examples illustrating the value of simulation for the estimation of demand systems and of semiparametrics for the estimation of entry models.
Ariel Pakes可是目下产业组织的一牛人，他的另外一篇关于动态产业组织分析框架的文章出现在产业组织理论手册第3卷中，哈佛大学的产业组织workshop多由他和Oliver Hart主持。
这就是产业组织理论手册第3卷的第33章
A Framework for Applied Dynamic Analysis in I.O. Ariel Pakes
This paper outlines a framework which computes and analyzes the equilibria from a class of dynamic games. The framework dates to Ericson and Pakes (1995), and allows for a finite number of heterogeneous firms, sequential investments with stochastic outcomes, and entry and exit. The equilibrium analyzed is a Markov Perfect equilibrium in the sense of Maskin and Tirole (1988). The simplest version of the framework is supported by a publically accessible computer program which computes equilibrium policies for user-specified primitives, and then analyzes the evolution of the industry from user-specified initial conditions. We begin by outlining the publically accessible framework. It allows for three types of competition in the spot market for current output (specified up to a set of parameter values set by the user), and has modules which allow the user to compare the industry structures generated by the Markov Perfect equilibrium to those that would be generated by a social planner and to those that would be generated by prefect collusion.'''' Next we review extensions that have been made to the simple framework. These were largely made by other authors who needed to enrich the framework so that it could be used to provide a realistic analysis of particular applied problems. The third section provides a simple way of evaluating the computational burden of the algorithm for a given set of primitives, and then shows that computational constraints are still binding in many applied situations. The last section reviews two computational algorithms designed to alleviate this computational constraint; one of which is based on functional form approximations and the other on learning techniques similar to those used in the artificial intelligence literature.
http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8024.pdf
这是俺喜欢的课程之一，NEIO和NTIO，多么般配的一对！
Empirical Methods in Industrial Organization
Syllabus
Professor Neil Gandal
This module will cover research methods in empirical industrial organization. The emphasis will
be on the use of econometric analysis and data for descriptive and measurement purposes, and to
test the predictions of economic theories. Papers that demonstrate various methods will be
discussed in detail with an emphasis on sources of identification, estimation techniques and data
issues.
Topics:
Introduction to the class and to the NEIO
Seminal Papers that illustrate empirical methods in IO with homogeneous products
Discrete Choice Models of Product Differentiation
The most important readings are indicated by an asterisk (*).
We will not use any particular text. The following books are recommended for references and
background reading.
Tirole, Jean. The Theory of Industrial Organization (M.I.T. Press, 1988).
Schmalensee, Richard, and Robert Willig, Handbook of Indutrial Organization,
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1989.
The following abbreviations are used for journal titles:
AER American Economic Review
BJE Bell Journal of Economics
EMA Econometrica
EJ Economic Journal
EER European Economic Review
GEB Games and Economic Behavior
IJIO International Journal of Industrial Organization
JEL Journal of Economic Literature
JET Journal of Economic Theory
JF Journal of Finance
JFE Journal of Financial Economics
JIE Journal of Industrial Economics
JLE Journal of Law and Economics
JLEO Journal of Law, Economics and Organization
2
JPE Journal of Political Economy
QJE Quarterly Journal of Economics
RJE Rand Journal of Economics
REStat Review of Economics and Statistics
REStud Review of Economic Studies
I. General Overview
Salinger, M. 1990, “The Concentration-Margin Relationship Reconsidered,” Brooking Papers on
Economic Activity Micr 287-335.
*Bresnahan, T.F., "Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power," Handbook of Industrial
Organization, Vol. II, chap. 17.
II. Short-Run Competition in Homogeneous Product Industries
*Bresnahan, T.F., "The Oligopoly Solution Concept is Identified," Economics Letters (10), 1982,
87–92.
*Porter, R.H., "A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Economic Committee, 1880–1886," BJE
(14), Autumn 1983, 301–14.
*Ellison, G., "Theories of Cartel Stability and the Joint Executive Committee," RJE (25), Spring
1994, 37–57.
III. Short-Run Competition in Differentiated Product Industries
Bresnahan, T.F., "Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile Oligopoly: The 1955
Price War," JIE (35), June 1987, 457–82.
*Berry, S.T., "Estimating Discrete Choice Models of Product Differentiation," RJE (25), Summer
1994, 242–62.
*Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes, "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium," EMA (63),
July 1995.
Nevo, A. “Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry,” NBER Working Paper
产业组织：计量经济学的作用和贡献
Industrial Organization: The Role and Contribution of Econometrics
Henry G Grabowski, Dennis C Mueller, AER 1970
最新的关于产业组织的计量经济学方法的课程
Applied Economics and Econometrics
of Industrial Organization and Innovation
European University Institute
Winter Term 2004
Professor Bronwyn H. Hall
Suggested Readings – Part I
1. Introduction and overview of applied econometrics for industrial organization (Jan. 20)
Aghion, Philippe, Nicholas Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, and Peter Howitt.
2003. “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship,” Working paper, University
College London.
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,”
in Nelson, R. R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, New Jersey:
Princeton University Press, pp. 602-625.
(*) Cohen, Wesley M., and Richard C. Levin. 1989. “Empirical Studies of Innovation and
Market Structure,” in Schmalensee, Richard and Willig, Robert D. (eds.), Handbook of
Industrial Organization, Vol. 2. Amsterdam; Oxford and Toky North-Holland, pp. 1059-
1107.
Gilbert, Richard, and David Newberry. 1982. “Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of
Monopoly,” American Economic Review 62: 514-526.
Nelson, Richard R. 1959. “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” Journal of
Political Economy, pp. 297-306.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1960. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Chapter 7.
(*) Sutton, John. 1998. Technology and Market Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chapters 1, 2.1-2.3, 3-6 (esp. 4), App. 2.4.
(*) Tirole, Jean. 1995. The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press,
Chapter 10, pp. 389-419.
2. Racing to innovate - empirical models (Jan. 27)
Chesbrough, Hank. 1999. “Arrested Development: The Experience of European Hard Disk
Drive Firms in Comparison with US and Japanese Firms,” Journal of Evolutionary
Economics 9(3): 287-329.
(*) Cockburn, Iain, and Rebecca Henderson. 1995. “Racing to Invest? The Dynamics of
Competition in Ethical Drug Discovery,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 3:
481-519.
(*) Henderson, Rebecca. 1993. “Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical
Innovation: Evidence form the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry,” Rand
Journal of Economics 24 (2: 248-270.
(*) Lerner, Josh. 1997. “An Empirical Exploration of a Technology Race,” Rand Journal of
Economics 28 (2: 228-247.
Reinganum, Jennifer. 1989. “Survey of R&amp;D Competition Models,” in Schmalensee, Richard
and Willig, Robert D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2. Amsterdam;
Oxford and Toky North-Holland.
3. Testing for network externalities; diffusion (Feb. 3)
Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Chris F. Kemerer. 1994. “Network Externalities in Microcomputer
Software: An Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market,” Management Science 42
(December): 1627-47.
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY,” American Economic Review
75: 332-337.
Economides, Nicholas, and Charles Himmelberg. 1995. “Critical Mass and Network Size
with Application to the U.S. Fax Market,” New York University, Salomon Brothers Working
Paper S/95/26 (August). Available from<IMG src="http://www.beiwang.com/a/images/pic/url.gif" align=absMiddle></FONT><a href="http://www.ssrn.com/" target="_blank" ><FONT size=3>http://www.SSRN.com</FONT></A>
<FONT size=3>Farrell, Joseph, and Garth Saloner. 1992. “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation,
Product Preannouncements, and Predation,” American Economic Review 76: 940-955.
Gandal, Neil. 1994. “Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for
Network Externalities,” Rand Journal of Economics 25(1): 160-70.
Gandal, Neil. 1995. “Competing Compatibility Standards and Network Externalities in the PC
Software Market,” Review of Economics and Statistics LXVII (4): 599-608.
(*) Gandal, Neil, Michael Kende, and Rafael Rob. 2000. “The Dynamics of Technological
Adoption in Hardware/Software Systems: The Case of Compact Disc Players,” Rand Journal
of Economics 31: 43-61.
Greenstein, Shane M. 1993. “Did Installed Base Give an Incumbent Any (Measurable
Advantages in Federal Computer Procurement?” Rand Journal of Economics 24 (1): 19-39.
Griliches, Zvi. 1957. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological
Change,” Econometrica 25: 27-52.
Hall, Bronwyn H., and Beethika Khan. 2003. “Adoption of New Technology,” in Jones,
Derek C., New Economy Handbook, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Also available on my UC
Berkeley website:<IMG src="http://www.beiwang.com/a/images/pic/url.gif" align=absMiddle></FONT><a href="http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/bhpapers.html" target="_blank" ><FONT size=3>http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/bhpapers.html</FONT></A>
<FONT size=3>Katz, Michael, and Carl Shapiro. 1994. “Systems Competition and Network Effects,” Journal
of Economic Perspectives 77: 93-115.
Klemperer, Paul. 1995. Competition When Customers Face Switching Costs. Review of
Economic Studies.
(*) Park, Sangin. 1997 (revised 2003). “Quantitative Analysis of Network Externalities in
Systems Competition: The VCR Case,” SUNY at Stony Brook. Availabe from his website:
http://ms.cc.sunysb.edu/~sanpark/NE-VCR.pdf
(*) Saloner, Garth, and Andrea Shepard. 1995. “Adoption of Technologies with Network
Effects: An Empirical Examination of the Adoption of Automated Teller Machines,” Rand
Journal of Economics 26(3: 479-501.
接楼上，这是第2部分
Applied Economics and Econometrics
of Industrial Organization and Innovation
European University Institute
Winter Term 2004
Professor Bronwyn H. Hall
Suggested Readings – Part II (revised 24 Feb 04)
1. Estimating the returns to R&amp;D using production functions (Feb. 17, 23)
Bernstein, Jeffrey I. and Nadiri, M. Ishaq. 1989. “Research and Development and Intra-
Industry Spillovers: An Empirical Applicaiton of Dynamic Duality,” Review of Economic
Studies 56: 249-69.
(*) Bond, Stephen, Dietmar Harhoff, and John Van Reenen. 2002. “Corporate R&amp;D and
Productivity in Germany and the United Kingdom,” Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, and
Ludwig-Maximiliens-Universitaet, Muenchen.
Crepon, Bruno, Emmanuel Duguet, and Jacques Mairesse. 1998. “Research, Innovation, and
Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level,” Economics of Innovation and New
Technology 7(3): 115-56.
Griffith, Rachel; Redding, Stephen and Van Reenen, John. 2003. “R&amp;D and Absorptive
Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 105(1): 99-
118.
(*) Griliches, Zvi. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&amp;D to Productivity
Growth,” Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92-116.
_____. 1958. “Research Cost and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations,”
Journal of Political Economy 66 (5): 419-431.
_____. 1967. “Hedonic Prices Indexes Revisited: Some Notes on the State of the Art,”
Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical
Association, pp. 324-332; reprinted in slightly altered form in Z. Griliches, ed, Price Indexes
and Quality Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 197l.
_____. 1992. “The Search for R&amp;D Spillovers.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94
(Supplement): S29-S47.
_____ (ed.). 1984. R&amp;D, Patents and Productivity. Chicag University of Chicago Press.
(*) Griliches, Zvi, and Jacques Mairesse. 1998. “Production Functions: The Search for
Identification,” in Z. Griliches, Practicing Econometrics: Essays in Method and Application,
Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. Also in Steinar Strom (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in
the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Econometric Society
Monograph Series 31, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Guellec, Dominique and van Pottelsberge de la Potterie, Bruno. 2001. “R&amp;D and Productivity
Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 Oecd Countries,” Paris: OECD.
Hall, Bronwyn H. 1996. “The Private and Social Returns to Research and Development,” In
Technology, R&amp;D, and the Economy, B. L. R. Smith and C. E. Barfield (eds.). Washington,
DC: Brookings Institution and American Enterprise Institute, pp. 140-183.
Hall, Bronwyn H. and Jacques Mairesse. 1995. “Exploring the Relationship Between R&amp;D
and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms,” Journal of Econometrics 65: 263-293.
Hall, Bronwyn H. 1993. “Industrial Research During the 1980s: Did the Rate of Return Fall?”
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Micro (2): 289-344.
Mairesse, Jacques and Sassenou, Mohamed. 1991. “R&amp;D and Productivity: A Survey of
Econometric Studies at the Firm Level,” OECD Science-Technology Review 8: 9-44.
(*) Mairesse, Jacques and Bronwyn H. Hall. 1994. “Estimating the Productivity of R&amp;D in
French and U.S. Manufacturing Firms: An Exploration of Simultaneity Issues with GMM,” In
International Productivity Comparisons, K. Wagner (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North
Holland.
2. Estimating the returns to R&amp;D using Market value (Feb. 24)
(*) Blundell, Richard, Rachel Griffith, and John van Reenen. 1999. “Market Share, Market
value, and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms.” Review of Economic
Studies 66: 529-554.
Griliches, Zvi. 1981. “Market value, R&amp;D and Patents,” Economics Letters 7: l83-l87.
Reprinted in Z. Griliches, ed., R&amp;D, Patents, and Productivity, 1984, 249-252, Chicag
University of Chicago Press.
Griliches, Zvi, Bronwyn H. Hall, and Ariel Pakes. 1991. “R&amp;D, Patents, and Market value
Revisited: Is There a Second (Technological Opportunity) Factor?” Economics of Innovation
and New Technology 1 (3): 1183-1201.
(*) Hall, Bronwyn H. 2000. “Innovation and Market value.” In Barrell, Ray, Geoffrey
Mason, and Mary O’Mahoney (eds.), Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Bronwyn H. and Raffaele Oriani. 2004. “Does the Market value R&amp;D Investment by
European Firms? Evidence from a Panel of Manufacturing Firms in France, Germany, and
Italy,” UC Berkeley and Universitá di Bologna.
Hayashi, Fumio. 1982. “Tobin’s Marginal Q and Average Q: A Neoclassical Interpretation,”
Econometrica 50 (1): 213-224.
Hayashi, Fumio, and Tohru Inoue. 1991. “The Relation between Firm Growth and Q with
Multiple Capital Goods: Theory and Evidence from Panel Data on Japanese Firms,”
Econometrica 59 (3): 739-753.
Jaffe, Adam. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&amp;D: Evidence from
Firms'' Patents, Profits, and Market value,” American Economic Review 76: 984-1001.
Wildasin, David. 1984. “The q Theory of Investment with Many Capital Goods,” American
Economic Review 74: 203-210.
Note that readings for which I am a coauthor can be found on my UC Berkeley website:
http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/bhpapers.html
接楼上，这是第3部分
Applied Economics and Econometrics
of Industrial Organization and Innovation
European University Institute
Winter Term 2004
Professor Bronwyn H. Hall
Suggested Readings – Part III (01 Mar 04)
1. Intellectual property (patent) policy (Mar. 1, 2)
Allen, Robert C. 1983. "Collective Invention," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4 (1):
1-24.
Arora, Ashish, Andrea Fosfuri and Alfonso Gambardella. 1999. Markets for Technology. Cambridge,
MA, MIT Press.
(*) Arundel, Anthony. 2000. "Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy," Maastricht: MERIT
Working Paper.
Bakels, Reinier and P. Bernt Hugenholtz. 2002. "The Patentability of Computer Programs," IViR
Working Paper No. EP Legal Affairs Series JURI 107 EN (April 2002).
Cohen, Wesley M., Richard R. Nelson, and John Walsh. 2000. “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets:
Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not),” Working Paper No.
W7552, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cowan, Robin and Elad Harrison. 2001. "Intellectual Property Rights in a Knowledge-Based
Economy," MERIT Infonomics Research Memorandum Working Paper No. 2001-027 (September).
(*) Gallini, Nancy, and Suzanne Scotchmer. 2001. "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best
Incentive System?" University of Toronto and UC Berkeley. NBER: Innovation Policy and the
Economy 2.
Hall, Bronwyn H., Albert N. Link, and John T. Scott. 2001. “Barriers Inhibiting Industry from
Partnering with Universities,” Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 87-98.
(*) Hall, Bronwyn H., and Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis. 2001. "The Patent Paradox Revisited:
Determinants of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1980-1994," Rand Journal of
Economics 32: 101-128.
Jaffe, Adam B. 2000. "The U. S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation
Process," Research Policy 29 (4-5): 531-558.
Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers
as Evidenced by Patent Citations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577-98
Kortum, Samuel, and Joshua Lerner. 1998. “Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What
is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy
48: 247-304.
Lerner, Joshua. 1995. “Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors,” Journal of Law and Economics 38:
463-495.
Levin, Richard C. 1988. “Appropriability, R&amp;D Spending, and Technological Performance,”
American Economic Review 78: 424-428.
Merges, Robert P. and Richard R. Nelson. 1990. “On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope,”
Columbia Law Review 90: 839-916.
Mowery, David C., Richard R. Nelson, Bhaven N. Sampat and Arvids A. Ziedonis. 2001. "The
Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-
Dole Act of 1980," Research Policy 30 (1): 99-119.
Sakakibara, Mariko and Lee G. Branstetter. 2001. "Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation?
Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms," Rand Journal of Economics 32 (1): 77-100.
Scotchmer, Suzanne. 1996. “Protecting Early Innovators: Should Second-Generation Products Be
Patentable,” Rand Journal of Economics 27: 322-331.
Shapiro, Carl. 2001. "Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard
Setting," NBER: Innovation Policy and the Economy 1: 119-150.
Walsh, John P., Ashish Arora and Wesley M. Cohen. 2003. Effects of Research Tool Patenting and
Licensing on Biomedical Innovation. Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. W. M. Cohen and S.
A. Merrill. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press: 285-340.
2. Patents as indicators (Mar. 16)
(*) Griliches, Zvi. 1990. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," Journal of Economic
Literature 28: 1661-1707.
Griliches, Zvi, Ariel Pakes, and Bronwyn H. Hall. 1987. “The value of Patents as Indicators of
Inventive Activity,” in Dasgupta and Stoneman (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological
Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(*) Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2004. "Market value and Patent
Citations" Rand Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
Harhoff, Dietmar, Frederic M. Scherer and Katrin Vopel. 2003. "Citations, Family Size, Opposition,
and the value of Patent Rights," Research Policy 32 (8): 1343-1364.
Hausman, Jerry A., Zvi Griliches, and Bronwyn H. Hall. 1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data
with an Application to the Patents-R&amp;D Relationship,” Econometrica 52 (July): 909-37.
Jaffe, Adam B., and Trajtenberg, Manuel. 1999. “International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from
Patent Citations,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8: 105-136.
Jaffe, Adam B., Trajtenberg, Manuel, and Michael Fogarty. 2000. “The Meaning of Patent Citations:
Report of the NBER/Case Western Reserve Survey of Patentees,” Working Paper No. 7631, National
Bureau of Economic Research.
Lanjouw, Jean O. and Mark Schankerman. 2001. “Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on
Competition,” RAND Journal of Economics, 129-151.
Toivanen, Otto, Paul L. Stoneman and Derek Bosworth. 2002. "Innovation and the Market value of
UK Firms, 1989 - 1995," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 64 (1): 39-62.
Note that readings for which I am a coauthor can be found on my UC Berkeley website:
http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/bhpapers.html
这是上面3层所贴的阅读材料的课程主页
http://www.iue.it/Personal/bhall/
Home page for Applied Economics and Econometrics of Innovation
Term II, 2003-2004
For information on my research or other courses, see my University of California at Berkeley website
Course syllabus
Course requirements
Part I
Readings
Lecture 1
Lecture 2
Lecture 3
Lecture 4
Part II
Readings
Lecture 5
Lecture 6
Lecture 7
Part III
Readings updated 16 Mar 04
Lecture 8
Lecture 9
Lecture 10 updated 16 Mar 04
Some problem sets using real data
Some of the readings online
刚才我们贴的仅仅是该课程的三部分的阅读材料，更多的讲义和其他材料，大家可以链接上去看看。此君来自加州伯克利大学，他们的德布鲁和钱颖一都为我们所熟知！
来自图卢兹的产业组织经验模型
更多好资源参<IMG src="http://www.beiwang.com/a/images/pic/url.gif" align=absMiddle></FONT><a href="http://www.univ-tlse1.fr/recherche/formation/CoursMPSE/ECOMATH/" target="_blank" ><FONT size=3>http://www.univ-tlse1.fr/recherche/formation/CoursMPSE/ECOMATH/</FONT></A>
<FONT size=3>Empirical Models in Industrial Organization
Economie Industrielle Appliquée
_____________________
Marc Ivaldi
Le séminaire porte sur l''étude de 9 thèmes à partir de la lecture d''articles récents. Il vise à
expliciter les étapes d''une analyse structurelle en économétrie. Chaque thème fait l''objet
d''exposé par les étudiants. L''évaluation est basée sur la participation des étudiants au
séminaire, sur la qualité des exposés et sur la production d’un document (5 à 10 pages)
présentant un projet de recherche empirique.
1. Pricing: Methods and mechanisms
1.1. Cost and industry structure
Atkinson, S.E. et R. Halvorsen, 1984, Parametric Efficiency Tests, "Economies of
Scale, and Input Demand in U.S. Electric Power Generation", International
Economic Review, Vol. 25, N°3, pp. 647-662.
Kaserman, D.L. et J.W. Mayo, 1991, "The Measurement of Vertical Economies and the
Efficient Structure of the Electric Utility Industry", The Journal of Industrial
Economics, Vol 39, N°5, pp. 483-502.
Kerkvliet, J., 1991, "Efficiency and Vertical Integration: The Case of Mine-Mouth
Electric Generating Plants", The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 39, N°5, pp.
467-482.
1.2. Demand analysis
Wolak, F.A., 1996, "Can Universal Service in a Competitive Telecommunications
Environment? Evidence from the United States Consumer Expenditure Survey".
Wolak, F.A., 1997, "The Welfare of Competitive Telecommunications Supply: A
Household-Level Analysis".
1.3. Contracts
Puelz, R. et A. Snow, 1994, "Evidence on Adverse Selection: Equilibrium Signaling and
Cross-Subsidization in the Insurance Market", Journal of Political Economy, Vol
102, N°2, pp. 236-257.
Chiappori, P.A. et B. Salanié, 1996, "Empirical Contract Theory: The Case of Insurance
Data", Document de travail CREST, N° 9639.
Dionne, G., C. Gouriéroux et C. Vanasse, "The Informational Content of Houselhold
Decisions with Application to Insurance under Adverse Selection", Document de
Travail CREST, N° 9701.
Gagnepain, P. et M. Ivaldi, 1999, "Incentive Regulatory Policies: The Case of Public
Transit Systems in France".
1.4. Auctions
McAfee, R.P. et J. McMillan, 1987, "Auctions and Bidding", Journal of Economic
Literature, N° 25, pp. 699-738.
Laffont, J.J., H. Ossard, et Q. Vuong, 1995, "Econometrics of First-Pice Auctions",
Econometrica, N° 63 (4), pp. 953-980.
Perrigne I., 1999, "Structural Econometrics of Auction Models".
2. Market conduct
2
2.1 Market power and collusion
Porter, R., 1983, "A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Excutive Committee: 1880-
1886", Bell Journal of Economics.
Ellison, G., 1994, "Theories of Cartel Stability and the Joint Executive Committee",
RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 25, N°1.
Baker, J.B. et T.F. Bresnahan, 1988, "Estimating the Residual Demand Curve Facing a
Single Firm", International Journal of Industrial Organization, N°6, pp. 283-300.
Bresnahan, T.F., 1987, "Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile
Industry: The 1995 Price War", The Journal of Industrial Economics", N°35:4, pp.
457-482.
Gasmi, F., J.J. Laffont et Q. Vuong, 1991, "Econometric Analysis of Collusive
Behavior in a Soft Drink Market", Journal of Regulatory Economics.
Steen, F. et K.G. Salvanes, 1999, "Testing for Market Power using a Dynamic
Oligopoly Model", International Journal of Industrial Organization, N°17, pp. 147-
177.
2.2 Price and product differentiation
Verboven, F., 1996, "International Price Discrimination in the European Car Market",
RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, N° 2, pp. 240-268.
Epple, D., 1987, "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Demand and Supply
Functions for Differentiated Products", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 95, N°1,
pp. 59-80.
Berry, S., J. Levinsohn et A. Pakes, 1992, "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium,
mimeo.
Hausman, J., G. Leonard et J.D. Zona, 1994, "Competitive Analysis with Differentiated
Products", Annales d''Economie et de Statistiques, N°34, pp. 159-180.
2.3 Exit, entry and switching costs
Bresnahan, T.F. et P.C. Reiss, 1990, "Entry in Monopoly Markets", Review of
Economics Studies, N° 57, pp. 531-553.
Bresnahan, T.F. et P.C. Reiss, 1994, "Measuring the Importance of Sunk Cost", Annales
d''Economie et de Statistiques, N° 34, pp. 181-217.
Berry, S., 1992, "Estimation of a Model of Entry in the Airline Industry",
Econometrica, N° 60, 4, pp. 889-917.
Cerasi, V., B. Chizzolini et M. Ivaldi, 1997, "Sunk Costs and Competitiveness of
European Banks after Deregulation".
Kim, M., D. Kliger et B. Vale, 1999, "Estimating Switching Costs and Oligopolistic
Behavior".
2.4 Research &amp; Development
Gandal, N., M. Kende et R. Rob, 1999, "The Dynamics of Technological Adoption in
Hardware/Software Systems: The Case of Compact Disc Players, Discussion Paper
CEPR N° 2078.
Lanjouw, J.O. et M. Scahnkerman, 1998, "Patent Suits: Do They Distort Research
Incentives?", Discussion Paper CEPR N° 2042.
Lanjouw, J.O., A. Pakes et J. Putnam, "How to Count Patents and value Intellectual
Property: The Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data".
3. Competition policy
3
3.1 Econometrics in the courtroom
Rubinfeld, D.L., 1985, "Econometrics in the Courtroom", Columbia Law Review, Vol.
85, pp. 1048-1097.
Swan, P.L., 1980, "Alcoa: The Influence of Recycling on Monopoly Power", Journal of
Political Economy, Vol. 88, N°1, pp. 76-99.
3.2 Evaluation of mergers
Werden G.J. et L.M. Froeb, 1998, "The Entry-Inducing Effects of Horizontal Mergers:
An Exploratory Analysis", The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.46, N°4, pp.
525-543.
Khemani, R.S. et D.M. Shapiro, 1993, "An Empirical Analysis of Canadian Merger
Policy", The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 41, N°2, pp. 161-177.
Werden G.J. et L.M Froeb, 1994, "The Effects of Mergers in Differentiated Products
Industries: Logit Demand and Merger Policy", The Journal of Law, Economics, &amp;
Organization, Vol. 10, N°2, pp. 407-437.
Berry, S. et A. Pakes, 1993, "Some Applications and Limitations of Recent Advances in
Empirical Industrial Organization: Merger Analysis", AEA Papers and Proceedings.
Kim, E.H. et V. Singal, 1993, "Mergers and Market Power: Evidence from the Airline
Industry", The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, N°3, pp. 549-569.</FONT>
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡
京公网安备 11010802022788号
