楼主: bigfoot0516
2526 31

[其他] 高盛:2012年1月中国证券市场投资策略报告(免费) [推广有奖]

学术权威

2%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
2
论坛币
11457949 个
通用积分
6.2396
学术水平
804 点
热心指数
577 点
信用等级
765 点
经验
54293 点
帖子
1764
精华
17
在线时间
452 小时
注册时间
2009-2-20
最后登录
2019-9-2

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Chinese indices are inexpensive, but imbalance is a concern
In the second note of our deep dive series, we explore investor FAQs: Why
do banks make up so much of index earnings? Do banks’ low valuations
explain the recent MXCN overall de-rating, and will it prevent a re-rating?
Q1: Why do banks make up such a large % of index EPS?
Banks comprise around 40-50% of MXCN/CSI300 earnings, high vs other
major markets and thus a source of investor worries. But, a deeper analysis
shows that banks earnings as a % of total China enterprise profits are around
19%, a much less concerning level. We think disproportionately high banks
earnings contribution is due more to disproportionately high % of its earnings
listed (80% of banks earnings are listed vs 30% for secondary industries),
rather than from regulation driving artificially inflated banks’ profits. Nearterm,
market concerns over banks’ earnings risks (mainly relating to NPL) are
understandable and may keep the sector valuation low. Over time, other
sectors’ faster earnings growth / fewer banks’ IPOs will likely gradually lead to
a more balanced MXCN earnings mix.
Q2: Are banks the main reason China is inexpensive?
The banking sector’s de-rating and large weighting do not appear to be the
only reasons for China’s low valuation. MXCN ex banks (and ex banks,
property, commodities) have also de-rated by about 3 P/E points in 2011
(vs 3.5 P/E points de-rating for MXCN; and 1.5 P/E points for DM markets).
Q3: If banks remain inexpensive, can China re-rate?
We think the market will unlikely re-rate back to historical mean levels as
structural concerns may take time to resolve. But, we think some degree of
valuation improvement is achievable for the index as cyclical pressures
ease. We target 9.5X MXCN fPER by end-2012E, from 8.5X at end-2011.
目录
Contents
Inexpensive due to imbalance? 2
Question 1: Why do banks make up such a large % of index earnings? 3
Question 2: Are banks the key reason why China is inexpensive? 14
Question 3: If banks remain inexpensive, can China re-rate? 18
Disclosure Appendix 23
2012-01-10_高盛高华_Chinadeepdive:Arebanksweighingdowntheindex/?.pdf (857.4 KB)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:投资策略报告 中国证券市场 证券市场 中国证券 投资策略 中国证券 investor 投资策略 explore Chinese

已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
arthistory4 + 140 + 5 + 5 + 4 根据规定进行奖励

总评分: 论坛币 + 140  学术水平 + 5  热心指数 + 5  信用等级 + 4   查看全部评分

沙发
wurengukou 发表于 2012-2-3 14:41:53 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢“免费”分享哈。

使用道具

藤椅
anacom 发表于 2012-2-4 12:48:30 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
很好,非常感谢

使用道具

板凳
xiaomo23 发表于 2012-4-23 13:02:37 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
沙发,谢谢院士,免费大餐
大杀四方

使用道具

报纸
cyberczar 发表于 2012-4-23 17:01:03 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
xiexielouzhu , ganxiefenxiang

使用道具

地板
国际玩笑218 发表于 2012-4-24 02:40:48 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
收藏了 谢谢

使用道具

7
恬园0809 发表于 2012-4-24 08:26:13 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
支持

使用道具

8
hongchenmoo 发表于 2012-5-16 16:12:18 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
xiexie
傻了好久~~~

使用道具

9
andiebogard 发表于 2012-7-10 10:56:15 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
ddddddddddddddddd

使用道具

10
ericzhou1229 发表于 2012-8-16 11:18:21 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
感谢~~~~~~~~~~

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-26 13:37