20120309 Follow Me 302 Why China's Factories Are Turning to Temp Workers

发现自己英文有些退化

The low remuneration may save a factory temporarily，while it won‘t be for ever.

Walke over with a smile and believe  all will be ok  

the mechanism of our society has much space to change and improve.

谢谢bengdi1986，谢谢楼主，谢谢eros-zz。
不过，我实在是不好意思拿这个奖。
我是觉得这个版块切合经济动态，又可以练英文，所以天天来坛里逛逛。
大家的贴子找得很好，自己找颇费功夫。
学业有点忙，忙里偷闲，看看短篇英文经济时事，看看大家的回复，说说自己的看法，同时可以得到坛友的鼓励与激励，是件挺让人身心愉快的事情。
更应该谢谢bengdi1986，eros-zz，他们是本版块最坚强的后盾。还有绵阳，制作了那么多期的follow me月刊。
祝版块兴旺，大家工作学业有成！

The number of labor is still large. The way of raising the worker's revenue is to simulate the domestic demand, especailly the demand for the new product. Thus,  demand and supply of the labour can be equilibrium.

I'm not familiar with the labor dispatch market, although I was often asked about the accounting entries for the payments to dispatched workers. And from those questions, I inferred that many labor dispatch companies pay the insurance fees for the workers, and the employers pay labor fees to the labor dispatch company, where the latter decucts some money, and pay insurances for the workers, then give the left to workers as salaries. Or, in another case, the employer pays wages to workers, and at the same time pays some amount of money to the labor dispatch company, who bears the workers' insurance fees. It sounds a little different from the passage.

If workers' insurance fees can be evaded, then why don't the private-owned companies employ them as the main human resource? I don't quite unstandard. And I'm also doubt of the percentage that state-owned companies employ these dispatched workers.

Yes, employees are always the loser without enough law to gurantee the rights!