楼主: 桶桶nancy
2939 17

[财经英语角区] 20120518 Follow Me 372 Student Loans: Is There Really A Crisis? [推广有奖]

已卖:3177份资源

院士

12%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
3
论坛币
29593 个
通用积分
31.3834
学术水平
1167 点
热心指数
1167 点
信用等级
1104 点
经验
8988 点
帖子
1389
精华
13
在线时间
1490 小时
注册时间
2011-11-2
最后登录
2025-12-30

初级学术勋章 中级学术勋章 高级学术勋章 初级热心勋章 中级热心勋章 高级热心勋章 初级信用勋章 中级信用勋章 高级信用勋章 特级学术勋章

楼主
桶桶nancy 在职认证  发表于 2012-5-17 20:25:53 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Student Loans: Is There Really A Crisis?

Student debt is completely out of control, right? The more than $1 trillion in outstanding college loans is front-page news and is pretty much the only educational issue the presidential candidates are talking about. Yes, ballooning student debt is causing real hardship for some Americans. But as with many educational flare-ups, the public debate is giving us more noise than signal. So before you decide to skip college based on the hysteria, here are a few things to keep in mind.


Students with $100,000 debt loads are far from the norm. On May 13 the New York Times took a long look at student loans. The paper profiled a student who just graduated from Ohio Northern University, a private Methodist college, with $120,000 in debt. That is a staggering amount, which is no doubt why the Times led with this young woman. But the article subsequently noted that just 3% of student borrowers owe more than $100,000; only 10% owe more than $54,000.


(MORE: College Admissions: How To Deal With The Thin Envelope)


Meanwhile, median debt for the two-thirds of U.S. college students who borrow to finance their education is only $12,800. That’s actually less than the difference in annual earnings between those with a college degree and those with only a high school education — a gap that government data shows is growing as the economy becomes more skill-based. That’s part of the reason for the rapidly rising student loan debt: we’re in the midst of an economic downturn, and people are returning to school to upgrade their skills. It wasn’t lost on Americans that college graduates were much less likely to be unemployed during the past few years.


Doubling the interest rate for federal student loans is less calamitous than it sounds. Under federal law, interest rates on federally backed Stafford loans are set to double from 3.4 to 6.8% in July. That sounds terrible, but the rate increase would only affect new loans. And for the average borrower, the higher rate — assuming, and that’s a big if, Congress doesn’t prevent the increase from kicking in this summer — would hike repayments by about $6 a month. Not trivial over the life of a loan, but not crippling either. The loan fight is more about Washington budget politics than it is about education policy.


It’s clearly in the public interest to help subsidize students to attend college. But where is the public interest in subsidizing especially expensive or niche choices like the kid who chose to go to Ohio Northern? That’s much less clear. Particularly since researchers including Alan B. Krueger, who chairs President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, have found that when it comes to predicting lifetime earnings, other factors such as ambition and tenacity seem to matter more than where you go to college.


(MORE: College Endowments: Why Even Harvard Isn’t As Rich As You Think)


It’s partly good news that student loans are surpassing credit card debt. Last fall the Federal Reserve gave parents everywhere a heart attack back in 2010 when it declared that student loan debt for the first time had surpassed credit card debt in the U.S. But what got less attention is that while student debt is rising, credit card debt is falling— by 11% in 2011, after also falling in 2010. Given our collective spending habits, that’s good news.


What should worry us more than the national student debt load — which is still not well understood because the data are so murky — is the likelihood that particular categories of students are getting a bad deal. Students at for-profit schools, for instance, are incurring more debt and in many cases getting little or no value for their money. These students tend to come from low-income families and returning military veterans and are the most likely of all college students — public, private, four-year, two-year — to default on their loans and torpedo their credit scores in the process. As a country, we need to do a better job of informing prospective students before they take on large debt loads at a certain school that other good — not to mention less costly — options are available.


The Obama Administration is taking steps to make information about college costs and performance more easily available to students and parents. The administration is also proposing a “Race to the Top” for colleges and universities in an effort to control costs — something that is long overdue. The availability of loans has spared higher education from pressure to cut costs or become more efficient and has also made it easy for state legislatures to cut spending on higher education and shift those costs to students through loans. In other words, loans have become something of a third-party payment system to finance bad habits throughout higher education policy.


(MORE: Can Obama Really Lower The Cost of College?)





了解Follow Us版
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1130480-1-1.html
英文网址,欢迎补充!
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1410923-1-1.html
Follow Us 发帖指南、常见问题及意见征集

https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1131076-1-1.html

关于Follow Us 版面建立官方群
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1212960-1-1.html

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Student really follow Crisis loans completely college control public decide

已有 7 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
starskyjing + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
绵阳 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
mu_lianzheng + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子
食神 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论
zhdefei + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
whachel1976 + 3 + 3 + 3 对论坛有贡献

总评分: 学术水平 + 11  热心指数 + 11  信用等级 + 11   查看全部评分

沙发
whachel1976 发表于 2012-5-18 07:13:34
It is said that US university offers high scholarship for students, which is part of the reason that many Chinese graduate students go there to pursue  doctor degrees with about another 7 years inspite of more than 2 years' graduate students' life having spent in Chinese mainland.
Many universities in US are privately-owned, I think, an alternative way to describe “for profit”. And teachers are often laid off in economic recessions in aiming of cutting federal expenditures.
Besides, it is said many political wisdoms are from universities or go back to universities as a professor. The title of professor entitles them high positions.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

藤椅
ljwyz 在职认证  学生认证  发表于 2012-5-18 08:07:46
The author provides many insights into student loan calamity, and thanks so much to his sage as well as  
neat explanation. But, author skips one key point, mentioned though, evading the significance of "education return" in student loan issue.

I highly doubt that student from Ohio Northern can find a job, since student from Ivy League can hardly find a fair salary. You got educated, you lose the job. Such effect, mixed with mass expectation of education return, leads to woe sign of student loan. Debt owner thinks student may somehow more unlikely to repay given hardship in labor market. Such lowering expection of education return, should be highlighted as it is the only key difference for student loan instrument
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 3 + 3 + 3 分析的有道理

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

板凳
潇湘夜雨123456 发表于 2012-5-18 12:36:19
看起来很厉害啊!!!!!!!!!!!!
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

报纸
happylife87 发表于 2012-5-18 12:42:40
It may seem fair to charge high fees if the quality is good enough and students can get good jobs after graduation. Higher education has less in externality, but scholarship is needed to give those with talents but may not continue study only because they are poor and uncertain about the future, especially in basic domains. As for the majority, the public should not pay for their tuitions.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

地板
h4wang 发表于 2012-5-18 13:18:12
Many universities in US are privately-owned, I think, an alternative way to describe “for profit”. And teachers are often laid off in economic recessions in aiming of cutting federal expenditures.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

7
sailingyf 发表于 2012-5-18 13:48:26
"Nothing to lose".
If I get a good, well-paid job, I will have the ability to pay my student loans after graduate.
But if I can't find a good job, then I don't need to lose anything, because I have nothing to lose!

已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

8
wangwh999 发表于 2012-5-18 14:20:18
I have no idea how much cost for  an American university student every year. Some our domestic media said there dont cost much because the American government will subsidize them. It seems not the truth according this article.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

9
phinjoy123 发表于 2012-5-18 15:12:00 来自手机
it's too long........

10
yf974421315 发表于 2012-5-18 15:42:13
Finished reading,unfinished thinking……
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

来思考

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-31 20:52