楼主: SASCHEN
1717 0

[100 Multilevel Questions]Normal Distribution Assumption in Multilevel ? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:130份资源

硕士生

10%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

Social Media Mining

深度學習(DEEP LEARNING)

HTML

威望
0
论坛币
2297 个
通用积分
3.6100
学术水平
4 点
热心指数
5 点
信用等级
4 点
经验
912 点
帖子
161
精华
0
在线时间
43 小时
注册时间
2005-9-25
最后登录
2022-10-29

楼主
SASCHEN 发表于 2014-3-17 23:29:47 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
I'm analysing reaction time data from a linguistic experiment (a variant of  a lexical decision task).   To ascertain that the data was normally distributed, I used *shapiro.test *for each participant (see commands below), but only one out of 21 returns a p value above p.0 05.

> f = function(dfr) return(shapiro.test(dfr$Target.RTinv)$p.value)
> p = as.vector(by(newdat, newdat$Subject, f))
> names(p) = levels(newdat$Subject)
> names(p[p < 0.05])

Removing a few outliers per subject doesn't make a difference, and aggressive" removal of outliers (done by subject, for each of the 6 conditions ) still results in non-normally distributed data by subject.

Does this invalidate any attempt at multi-level modelling?



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:distribution Multilevel assumption questions question function returns levels names

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-20 15:46