3016 2

[经济学模型] NEG文献研读1:Krugman Paul. The new economic geography, now middle-aged [推广有奖]

学科带头人

83%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
11846 个
通用积分
123.8486
学术水平
56 点
热心指数
84 点
信用等级
52 点
经验
28826 点
帖子
1588
精华
2
在线时间
2095 小时
注册时间
2007-4-28
最后登录
2024-11-19

楼主
区域经济爱好者 发表于 2014-4-25 09:16:34 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
重新开启文献研读。这是第三个主题:新经济地理(NEG),第1篇文献

Krugman Paul. The new economic geography,now middle-aged [J]. Regional Studies, 2011, 45(1), 1-7.



这篇文章讨论了经济学的基本方法论-what if,分析了新经济地理模型建立的四条原则,指出NEG模型适合表达发展中经济,而不是发达经济体

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Geography Economic KRUGMAN Middle econom because equivalent reference something together

已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
linmengmiki + 100 对论坛有贡献

总评分: 论坛币 + 100   查看全部评分

感兴趣领域——宏观经济、区域经济与技术经济

沙发
区域经济爱好者 发表于 2014-4-25 11:34:22
没看懂的问题

Krugman (2010)在“The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-aged”中,写到他建立模型的四个原理:其中两个(下面),没看懂。请大家指点。谢谢。

Nodormitive properties: the reference is toMolie`re’s doctor, who triumphantly explains that opium puts people to sleepbecause of its dormitive properties. The economics equivalent is the assertionthat production clumps together because of agglomeration economies; I wanted toderive those agglomeration economies from something more fundamental, such asthe interaction among economies of scale, transportation costs and market size.This meant, among other things, downplaying invisible external economies likeinformation spillovers.

Distancebetween assumptions and conclusions: this is alittle hard to explain if you are not in the modeling business, but there is abroad sense, which I share, that you are learning more from a model if therabbit is not stuffed too visibly into the hat just before the theorist pullsit out. For that reason I did not follow FUJITA (1988) in assuming that thereare non-traded inputs produced with economies of scale; even if that is reasonablein many cases, it would be more interesting to show agglomeration emergingwithout such a strong assumption.
感兴趣领域——宏观经济、区域经济与技术经济

藤椅
区域经济爱好者 发表于 2014-4-26 21:46:25
一个朋友的解答

英语世界很多人引用非安眠药性质来批评同义语反复的解释方式,“为什么说这种药是安眠药呢?因为它能够安眠”。对于聚集的同义反复的解释思路就是聚集经济理论,“为什么存在聚集呢?因为存在聚集经济”。克鲁格曼等人认为聚集经济理论对于聚集的解释太低级了,是同义语反复;克氏决定揭示更深层次的机制来解释聚集现象。
感兴趣领域——宏观经济、区域经济与技术经济

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-1 08:31