楼主: danielmira
1769 0

[世界经济热点] Alan S. Blinder谈国际贸易与就业 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 20粉丝

已卖:4338份资源

讲师

9%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
9196 个
通用积分
8.5103
学术水平
28 点
热心指数
33 点
信用等级
18 点
经验
9452 点
帖子
218
精华
0
在线时间
434 小时
注册时间
2004-12-25
最后登录
2025-8-6

楼主
danielmira 发表于 2016-4-27 21:40:28 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
著名经济学家Alan S. Blinder在华尔街日报上有一篇很好的文章http://www.wsj.com/articles/five ... ut-trade-1461280205)。最让我印象深刻的是他谈贸易和就业的关系。他说,每个月美国创造5百万个就业岗位,摧毁大约5百万个。两相抵消带来小幅度的净就业岗位的增加。这个现象是由于竞争和技术进步而非国际贸易。
John Cochrane([url]http://johnhcochrane.blogspot.com/2016/04/blinder-on-trade.html)[/url]摘录了他的文章,并作了点评。他的摘录如下:
1. Most job losses are not due to international trade. Every month roughly five million new jobs are created in the U.S. and almost that many are destroyed, leaving a small net increment. International trade accounts for only a minor share of that staggering job churn. ...

2. Trade is more about efficiency—and hence wages—than about the number of jobs. You probably don’t sew your own clothes or grow your own food. Instead, you buy these things from others, using the wages you earn doing something you do better.  ...
3. Bilateral trade imbalances are inevitable and mostly uninteresting. Each month I run a trade deficit with Public Service Electric & Gas. They sell me gas and electricity; I sell them nothing....

4. Running an overall trade deficit does not make us “losers.”...

5. Trade agreements barely affect a nation’s trade balance. ..a nation’s overall trade balance is determined by its domestic decisions, not by trade deals... America’s chronic trade deficits stem from the dollar’s international role and from Americans’ decisions not to save much, not from trade deals. Trade deficits are not a major cause of either job losses or job gains. ...trade makes American workers more productive and, presumably, better paid.
1. Most job losses are not due to international trade. Every month roughly five million new jobs are created in the U.S. and almost that many are destroyed, leaving a small net increment. International trade accounts for only a minor share of that staggering job churn. ...

2. Trade is more about efficiency—and hence wages—than about the number of jobs. You probably don’t sew your own clothes or grow your own food. Instead, you buy these things from others, using the wages you earn doing something you do better.  ...
3. Bilateral trade imbalances are inevitable and mostly uninteresting. Each month I run a trade deficit with Public Service Electric & Gas. They sell me gas and electricity; I sell them nothing....

4. Running an overall trade deficit does not make us “losers.”...

5. Trade agreements barely affect a nation’s trade balance. ..a nation’s overall trade balance is determined by its domestic decisions, not by trade deals... America’s chronic trade deficits stem from the dollar’s international role and from Americans’ decisions not to save much, not from trade deals. Trade deficits are not a major cause of either job losses or job gains. ...trade makes American workers more productive and, presumably, better paid.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Blinder blind 国际贸易 Alan LAN 华尔街日报 经济学家 国际贸易 created trade

博客:http://danielyoung.blog.sohu.com/

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-29 06:58