楼主: bigfoot0518
1811 3

[其他] 德意志银行:美国REITs行业研究报告2009年10月(免费) [推广有奖]

已卖:2563份资源

学术权威

70%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
10
论坛币
10441579 个
通用积分
7.0590
学术水平
1222 点
热心指数
923 点
信用等级
1220 点
经验
65985 点
帖子
2052
精华
21
在线时间
405 小时
注册时间
2008-12-11
最后登录
2021-8-16

楼主
bigfoot0518 发表于 2009-10-23 16:32:06 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Rent or Buy?
Broader equilibrium within
reach
John Perry
Research Analyst
(+1) 212 250-4912
john.perry@db.com
Nishu Sood, CFA
Research Analyst
(+1) 212 250-4756
nishu.sood@db.com
Conor Fennerty
Research Associate
(+1) 212 250-1576
conor.fennerty@db.com
Seasonal uptick in home prices expands rent-buy gap
The national rent-buy gap widened by 8.5% in 2Q to 84.0% (see Figure 1), which
while down from 1Q, is the second highest level since 1Q 2004. The median
home price was up 8.9% from 1Q as home prices benefited from the seasonal uptick
in activity. Year-over-year, median prices are down 13.0% in the markets we
track, which is up from the 17.6% y-o-y decline at the end of 1Q.
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
All prices are those current at the end of the previous trading session unless otherwise indicated. Prices are sourced from local
exchanges via Reuters, Bloomberg and other vendors. Data is sourced from Deutsche Bank and subject companies. Deutsche
Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm
may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single
factor in making their investment decision. Independent, third-party research (IR) on certain companies covered by DBSI's research
is available to customers of DBSI in the United States at no cost. Customers can access IR at
http://gm.db.com/IndependentResearch or by calling 1-877-208-6300. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE
LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MICA(P) 106/05/2009
Industry Update
Global Markets Research Company
California is at or beyond 1999 affordability levels
The rapid pace of home price declines in California has returned the majority of
markets in the state to the rent-buy relationship and affordability of 1999 (see
Figures 10 and 11). This is our theoretical “equilibrium” year as the rent-buy gap
and affordability were relatively stable during the 1990s. Oakland, Sacramento,
San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, and San Jose are all at or beyond 1999
levels.
New York metro adjustment continues to lag the national average
We do not have data for Manhattan but rather northern New Jersey and Long
Island. The rent-buy gap did not expand as rapidly in these markets as it did in
California and Florida, but it did widen considerably (see Figure 10). Long Island
continues to trail the rapid rent-buy trend reversal. In 1999, rent as a percentage of
ATMP was 108.1%. In 2Q09, this figure was 72.3%. Similarly, rent as a
percentage of ATMP in Northern New Jersey was 85.3% in 1999 versus 72.2% in
2Q09.
What happens if rents and home prices decline?
Over the last six quarters falling home prices have been the primary factor in
closing the rent-buy gap. Looking ahead, we’ve prepared a “pro forma” analysis to
reflect the still fragile economy. With home prices seasonally at their strongest in
2Q, our pro forma assumes a 10% drop in home prices across the board, a 4.50%
mortgage rate, and a 10% decline in rents. Under this scenario, the vast majority
of the markets we have analyzed would return to theoretical equilibrium. However,
as we’ve seen with multiple markets, just because a market reaches equilibrium
does not mean it will stabilize. If people believe a home is a depreciating asset,
people will pay a premium to rent.
Other affordability metrics might be overstating how cheap homes are
Popular affordability metrics such as the National Association of Realtors’ have led
most investors to believe that homes are cheap by historical standards. Our rentbuy
analysis argues otherwise (see Figure 12). That’s not to say that affordability
hasn’t improved dramatically – it has; however, it is simply back in line with earlier
periods as opposed to being at all time highs. The different conclusions stem from
different methodologies. We think our methodology paints the correct picture,
because 1) it uses a more appropriate mortgage rate, 2) it takes into account
trends in the rental market and 3) it is based on local level data.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:行业研究报告 REITs 德意志银行 研究报告 行业研究 研究报告 national highest 德意志 second

已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
clarklh + 20 对论坛有贡献

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

沙发
pengsong 发表于 2009-11-2 12:31:21
谢谢!
不管什么原因免费,总之是感谢你的

藤椅
lq94 发表于 2009-11-2 20:27:55
非常感谢楼主的无私奉献

板凳
cdots 发表于 2010-10-10 00:48:21
bigfoot居然免费大放送,世界和平之曙光啊,支持一下

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-17 21:04