幸福生活的经济学路径：min∫0+∞[B-U(x)+V(l)]dt, s.t. dk/dt=f(l,c)-x

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

min∫0+∞[B-U(x)+V(l)]dt
s.t. dk/dt=f(l,c)-x
where,
    0    lower limit of integration
    +∞    upper limit of integration
    B    maximum value of satisfaction of demand, conditioned on long-run technical level available to make use of measurable resources or endowment
    U(x)    utility achieved by spend monetary earning at amount of x
    V(l)    payment earned by means of providing labour services at amount of l by individual or group of people, and paid by employer or business activity
    t    time
    k    capital
    x    expenditure for consumption

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏2 回帖

关键词：幸福生活 经济学 Min satisfaction Integration 经济学 路径 社会 幸福

有才、、、、、、、、、

请问：您看懂了吗？别光顾着夸奖呀！
2# xing10

什么呀在这时

岂有此理？您博士生的学术水平竟然没有在下本科生高？！
4# mingytxia

regressi0n 发表于 2011-3-13 10:41
min∫0+∞[B-U(x)+V(l)]dt
s.t. dk/dt=f(l,c)-x
where,
    0    lower limit of integration
    +∞    upper limit of integration
    B    maximum value of satisfaction of demand, conditioned on long-run technical level available to make use of measurable resources or endowment
    U(x)    utility achieved by spend monetary earning at amount of x
    V(l)    payment earned by means of providing labour services at amount of l by individual or group of people, and paid by employer or business activity
    t    time
    k    capital
    x    expenditure for consumption

  B 表示满足人的需求的最大价值，这个价值长期适用，从技术上说，是利用可测量的资源与天赋计算的。
        U(x) 表示效用，这个效用是在数值为x时由花费货币性收入达到的。
        V(l)  表示报偿，这个报偿是在数值为 l 时通过个人或群体提供劳动服务的手段获得的，由雇主或经营活动支付的。
        t     表示时间
        k    表示资本
        x    表示消费支出

Would you like to make some comments on what my poor understanding happiness in such mathematical way?
6# 吴本龙

regressi0n 发表于 2011-4-19 13:04
Would you like to make some comments on what my poor understanding happiness in such mathematical way?
6# 吴本龙

   Sorry! I wouldn't like to analysis your Mathematical formula about happiness through economics way，because I don't agree that happiness could be expressed by  Mathematical formula.

Y?! So accurate and rational that overwhelming economists pursuit such objectives earnestly as much as anything. Your propensity seems really different from those who are in line with economic science. Would you mind if it is possible to make it more clearly? Thanks in advance.
8# 吴本龙

Don't  be anxious to say thank！I have nothing to say .