摘要翻译:
本文讨论了英国养老金保护基金(PPF)面临的金融风险,以及它可以采取的措施。它借鉴了银行和保险公司等其他金融机构运作的监管制度,并询问为什么养老基金受到不同的待遇。它还审查了其他ZF赞助的保险计划的经验,如美国养恤金福利担保公司,PPF是根据该公司的模式建立的。我们的结论是,由于道德风险、逆向选择,特别是面临的系统性风险,PPF将长期处于破产风险之下。
---
英文标题:
《Financial Risks and the Pension Protection Fund: Can it Survive Them?》
---
作者:
David Blake, John Cotter and Kevin Dowd
---
最新提交年份:
2011
---
分类信息:
一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类:Risk Management 风险管理
分类描述:Measurement and management of financial risks in trading, banking, insurance, corporate and other applications
衡量和管理贸易、银行、保险、企业和其他应用中的金融风险
--
一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类:Portfolio Management 项目组合管理
分类描述:Security selection and optimization, capital allocation, investment strategies and performance measurement
证券选择与优化、资本配置、投资策略与绩效评价
--
一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类:Statistical Finance 统计金融
分类描述:Statistical, econometric and econophysics analyses with applications to financial markets and economic data
统计、计量经济学和经济物理学分析及其在金融市场和经济数据中的应用
--
---
英文摘要:
This paper discusses the financial risks faced by the UK Pension Protection Fund (PPF) and what, if anything, it can do about them. It draws lessons from the regulatory regimes under which other financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies, operate and asks why pension funds are treated differently. It also reviews the experience with other government-sponsored insurance schemes, such as the US Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, upon which the PPF is modelled. We conclude that the PPF will live under the permanent risk of insolvency as a consequence of the moral hazard, adverse selection, and, especially, systemic risks that it faces.
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.5978