楼主: whachel1976
1856 4

[财经英语角区] 20111003 What we really need to fear about China 我们真正需要担心中国什么? [推广有奖]

院士

22%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
2
论坛币
25133 个
通用积分
8001.7030
学术水平
1309 点
热心指数
1326 点
信用等级
1145 点
经验
174949 点
帖子
1672
精华
10
在线时间
2668 小时
注册时间
2010-12-17
最后登录
2023-11-23

初级学术勋章 初级热心勋章 初级信用勋章 中级热心勋章 高级热心勋章 中级学术勋章

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
What we really need to fear about China

By Vivek Wadhwa, Published: September 27


American policy makers worry about the dramatic increases in the number of academic papers being published and patents being filed by Chinese researchers. They believe that these will give China a formidable competitive advantage when it comes to innovation. After all, China is now only second to the U.S. in academic publications, and by 2015 it will file more patents annually than the U.S. does.


Our policy makers are right to worry, but they are worried about the wrong things.

The Chinese academic papers are largely irrelevant or are plagiarized. They do little more than boost national pride. Almost no innovation is coming from government-funded research labs. Meanwhile, Chinese patents aren’t an indicator of innovation, but are tollbooths(过路收费亭) that the country is erecting to tax foreign companies that come to China. The Chinese have learned to play the same games that American tech companies and patent trolls do: Use patents to extort licensing fees from other industry players.


China’s real advantage lies in its next generation — the students who graduate from its top colleges and become entrepreneurs. These kids are very similar to their counterparts in the West. They are smart, motivated, and ambitious. Whereas the children of the Cultural Revolution—who now work in government research labs and lead the State enterprises that dominate industry learned not to challenge authority and to play strictly by government rules, the new generation knows no bounds. They are not even aware of the atrocities of the previous era. They don’t hesitate to think outside the box, to take risks, or to have ambition. Unlike their parents, this new generation can innovate.


The changes I have seen in the entrepreneurial scene in China during my visits over the last six years are dramatic. It used to be that Chinese graduates strove to join Western multinationals. And because of the taboo associated with failure and the low social esteem granted to start-ups, parents discouraged their children from becoming entrepreneurs. No longer. With the success of entrepreneurs such as Jack Ma and Kaifu Lee and the fortunes being reaped by the earlier generations of technology startups, Chinese youth have role models, and parents are becoming more accepting of entrepreneurship. Joining a startup is now the “in thing” in China—just as in Silicon Valley. And it’s becoming acceptable to fail and start again.


There are start-up incubators springing up in all of China’s major cities. According to Lux Research, China venture capital investments reached $5.4 billion in 2010 —an increase of 79 percent from the year before. There is so much Angel and Venture Capital available that investors have to compete for investment. One incubator I visited last week, in Beijing, called Garage Cafe, is offering free office space and Internet connectivity to start-ups just so that it can jump to the front of the line on investments.


During my most recent trip this past week, I also I taught classes at Tsinghua University, for an entrepreneurship program run by UC-Berkeley’s Center for Entrepreneurship. The students there were very much like those I teach at Duke and Berkeley. They were hungry for knowledge, connections, and ideas. The only difference I noted was in the answer to one question: Why do you want to become an entrepreneur? American students usually talk about building wealth or changing the world. The Chinese said they saw entrepreneurship as a way to rise above “the system,” to be their own bosses and to create their own paths to success. They clearly did not cherish the idea of working for a stodgy(索然无味的)state enterprise, an autocratic government, or what they deemed to be an opportunistic foreign multinational.


The tens of thousands of highly educated immigrants who return home to China every year from the U.S., give China’s entrepreneurial ecosystem a major boost. These returning immigrants are teaching locals how to build Silicon Valley–style companies.


Take Robert Hsiung, who graduated from Stanford in 2008. He received several job offers in Silicon Valley, Singapore, and Hong Kong. But he chose to become an entrepreneur and to move to Beijing, because the economy was booming and the number of Chinese Internet users was increasing rapidly. Robert’s first start-up, a social-media company called OneCircle.cc, was a moderate success. His next company, FoxFly, failed because larger players moved into his market space. In August, he launched his third start-up, which is building a professional-networking application. Robert told me that he had absolutely no problems recruiting top engineering students. And even though he had failed, Chinese investors readily invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in his latest start-up.


China has a chance to harness all this new energy and lead the world in innovation. But that doesn’t mean that it will. I asked students and local entrepreneurs about the obstacles that they expected to face. Nearly all of them cited two fears: That a bigger company, such as Baidu or Tencent, would steal their technology—because Chinese intellectual property laws are ineffective—and that once they achieved significant success, government officials would swoop(俯冲) in to control the company or demand a cut of the action.


Until China’s rule of law is strengthened and entrepreneurs are given the freedoms that they need, China may see a lot of start-up activity, but world-changing innovation won’t happen. Once China clears away those final obstacles, though, watch out.


来源:http://www.washingtonpost.com/na ... QAPrMy0K_story.html


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:really About China What Real really about China

已有 2 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
eros_zz + 40 + 1 + 2 + 2 对论坛有贡献
bengdi1986 + 60 + 2 + 2 + 2 this topic is thought-provoking

总评分: 论坛币 + 100  学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 4  信用等级 + 4   查看全部评分

沙发
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-10-3 14:17:24 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
I stand in the line with the author! There are no need for American to fear that the increasing number of academic papers and registered patents,in other words,they overestimate the technology in our nation.

As a student in China, we are ashamed of what and how the paper formulated. …………only use those dots express my emotion to the phenomenon.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 + 2 + 1 观点有启发

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 2  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

藤椅
whachel1976 发表于 2011-10-4 02:55:27 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
I think the author is an expert in writing papers and applying for new patents, so he is familiar with it. But he doesn't know quite a lot about the practice, a sentiment of admiration is mingled in his words when talking about the creative students.
Some papers cannot turn into productivity, so they are useless in real world. But maybe the theory can illuminate some newcomers. After all, have is better than have-not. I admire both of them, those who own papers and patents and those who are innovative in business

使用道具

板凳
whachel1976 发表于 2011-10-4 02:55:35 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
I think the author is an expert in writing papers and applying for new patents, so he is familiar with them. But he doesn't know quite a lot about the practice, so sentiment of admiration is mingled in his words when talking about the creative students.
Some papers cannot turn into productivity, so they are useless in real world. But maybe the theory can illuminate some newcomers. After all, have is better than have-not. I admire both of them, those who own papers and patents and those who are innovative in business.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 20 + 2 + 2 + 2 inspiring views

总评分: 论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 2  热心指数 + 2  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

使用道具

报纸
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-10-4 10:39:21 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Turn to the point, he neglected the truth in our country:Students in the college wouldn't try their best to persue for creativity or innovation. They would rather have a break in their long studying journey than continue to self-actulize their own values.
Of course , that's a macro view. Different students have different minds! As what you said "have is better than have-not",I believe it's better to study in college than none.
After all, the American prepares for danger though they are the NO1,that's a good vitue or conduct.Perhaps that's the nature and sources of innovation!
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 2 + 2 + 2 Good point!

总评分: 学术水平 + 2  热心指数 + 2  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-2 04:58