楼主: renda-ellipsis
5400 46

[财经英语角区] 20111025 Follow Me 168 Unrest in peace [推广有奖]

  • 4关注
  • 0粉丝

讲师

49%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
130 个
通用积分
4.8000
学术水平
42 点
热心指数
50 点
信用等级
35 点
经验
2498 点
帖子
328
精华
0
在线时间
716 小时
注册时间
2009-6-1
最后登录
2024-1-26

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Unrest in peace
Protests in the West have roots beyond bouts of austerity




AFTER two decades of stable growth and mostly quiet streets the rich world has become an unruly place. Hundreds of protesters have been camped in New York’s financial district since September, inspiring similar movements in large cities around the world. In Rome the protests turned violent as demonstrators set cars alight and hurled rocks at police. Greek workers demonstrated again this week against yet another set of austerity measures. Public anger is clearly fuelled by economic troubles, but the link between economic conditions and unrest is complex.


Instability is often blamed on creeping austerity. After the riots in London in August, Ken Livingstone, a former mayor, declared that “the economic stagnation and cuts being imposed by the Tory government inevitably create social division.” A recent paper by Jacopo Ponticelli and Hans-Joachim Voth of Barcelona’s Universitat Pompeu Fabra suggests he may have a point. They assemble a data set of chaotic episodes in Europe between 1919 and 2009—a mix of protests, strikes, assassinations and attempted revolutions—and find a tight relationship between fiscal austerity and unrest. Episodes of instability occur twice as often when spending cuts reach 5% of GDP as when expenditure is rising.


Such dangers are well appreciated in the emerging world, which has much greater experience of austerity. Cuts have often been associated with civil violence. In a separate study of fiscal consolidation in Latin America between 1937 and 1995, Mr Voth pinpoints a tight link between fiscal consolidation and instability, across democracies and autocracies alike.


Protests induced by austerity also attract far more participants than demonstrations sparked by other causes. In a sample of European protests from 1980 to 1995, austerity-focused protests attracted over 700,000 people on average, the authors find. Anti-war protests averaged just under 15,000 attendees. Tax increases do not have a significant effect on the likelihood of unrest, however, which suggests that distributional issues play a role in inciting public ire. Tax rises often have greater impact on the upper-income elite; service cuts are felt more keenly by those on lower incomes who may already feel disenfranchised.


Anger at austerity is likely to be just one component of public dissatisfaction. High debt levels across the rich world owe much to the impact of weak growth on tax revenues. Messrs Ponticelli and Voth control for the impact of growth in their study and find a causal role for changes in GDP alongside that for budget cuts. A 1% increase in GDP reduces the expected number of demonstrations per year by about 0.4 events, roughly half the impact of a similar increase in the government budget. Weak growth and high unemployment rates are an obvious recipe for discontent. In 2010 the International Labour Organisation warned that high levels of joblessness, and of youth unemployment especially, were likely to trigger above-normal levels of social unrest.

Inequality is also an engine of protest. A classic 1994 paper by Alberto Alesina of Harvard University and Roberto Perotti of Bocconi University studied 71 countries between 1960 and 1985 and found that higher levels of income inequality were associated with increased social instability. Their explanation was that unrest often erupts when a wealthy middle class is weakened.

That idea resonates strongly now. By one estimate, 58% of the real economic growth in America of the past 30 years was captured by the top 1% of earners: the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators are embracing a motto of “We are the 99%”. The rise in American income inequality reflected a dramatic “polarisation” of the labour force into high- and low-skill segments at the expense of middle-skill (and middle-wage) positions, according to research by David Autor of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Just as the apparently benign macroeconomic environment of the past two decades masked a build-up of financial instability, it may also have been storing up the elements of prolonged social discontent.

Even where the grass is greener
Much of this hollowing out of the American workforce is down to technology, but some of it stems from globalisation. Structural changes in the world economy can cause instability in countries where output is expanding as well as in sluggish ones. Rapid emerging-market growth is placing pressure on the world’s notoriously inefficient food markets, for example. A 2011 IMF study of 120 countries between 1970 and 2007 found that a 10% increase in food prices was associated with a doubling in the number of anti-government protests, though only in low-income countries.

Growth that undermines existing social institutions and dislocates workers is also likely to generate instability. In China mass migrations associated with rapid catch-up growth and urbanisation are often blamed for causing instability. Instances of “mass disturbances” have risen steadily since 1993, even as the Chinese economy has enjoyed scorching growth. Ricardo Hausmann of Harvard University similarly argues that Egypt’s steps towards economic liberalisation stimulated an appetite for greater opportunity that fuelled discontent with the ruling regime.

Research by MIT’s Daron Acemoglu and Harvard’s James Robinson finds that relatively undemocratic governments have historically extended voting rights in order to convince a restive public of the promise of future redistribution. In the West, that is not an option. A bit more growth and a bit less austerity might take the edge off public anger. But if social unrest has its roots in the effects of structural economic changes, a more fundamental societal reckoning may be needed. A study by Patricia Justino of the University of Sussex examined inequality and unrest in India and found that redistribution can quell an outcry. That may well be the outcome of the current turmoil, too.



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:follow Peace Rest Est RES 2011 beyond similar around become

已有 12 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
useranna + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
lxmuoi + 1 + 1 + 1 对论坛有贡献
starskyjing + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
ddovels + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
caihongchn + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
gaper808 + 20 + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子
若莫离 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
shmily0802 + 1 + 1 谢谢分享,我是每天必读
eros_zz + 2 很好!

总评分: 论坛币 + 140  学术水平 + 15  热心指数 + 15  信用等级 + 15   查看全部评分

沙发
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-10-25 09:33:23 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
坐沙发没问题了吧

This is a topic about the unrest in the peace! The unrest or instability is caused by austerity and inequality. Jacopo Ponticelli and Hans-Joachim found a tight relationship between fiscal austerity and unrest. Meanwhile, Mr Voth came up with the similar conclusion.

Of course, inequality is also an engine of protest. According to the Revolution Theory which contains two aspects: frustration theory and power theory. Inequality is likely to lead discontented or aggrieved. In order to comfort their grudges, protest is good express!


已有 2 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 + 1 + 1 怎么看怎么像在读的论文。
caihongchn + 1 + 1 总结得很好

总评分: 学术水平 + 2  热心指数 + 2  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

藤椅
秋波散花 在职认证  发表于 2011-10-25 09:35:04 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
学习学习
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
桉树熊 + 3 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 热心指数 + 3   查看全部评分

使用道具

板凳
秋波散花 在职认证  发表于 2011-10-25 09:35:13 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
学习学习

使用道具

报纸
cglee 发表于 2011-10-25 10:50:27 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
The studies quoted in this article contribute to understanding Obama's latest  economic stimulus plan, which comprises raising high-income earner's tax as well as increasing government spending to expand employment, despite nowadays public debt is in a very high level.
已有 4 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 + 1 对论坛有贡献
caihongchn + 1 + 1 同意!
桉树熊 + 2 + 3 分析的有道理
bengdi1986 + 11 + 2 + 1 + 1 我很赞同

总评分: 论坛币 + 31  学术水平 + 5  热心指数 + 6  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

地板
shmily0802 发表于 2011-10-25 11:18:55 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢分享,我是每天必读,保持英语水平很重要,我会继续下去
已有 1 人评分热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桉树熊 + 3 + 2 共同成长吧~

总评分: 热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

使用道具

7
泰斗 发表于 2011-10-25 12:00:46 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
今天又来顶,稍后回来!为什么6个人回复,而我却在7楼啊?
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
桉树熊 + 3 手慢了吧。。

总评分: 热心指数 + 3   查看全部评分

使用道具

8
泰斗 发表于 2011-10-25 12:06:29 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
shmily0802 发表于 2011-10-25 11:18
谢谢分享,我是每天必读,保持英语水平很重要,我会继续下去
这个我也是每天来读,但是感觉难度也就相当于CET6级,不知道对英语提高帮助到底有多大?

使用道具

9
若莫离 发表于 2011-10-25 12:18:33 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
The text analyses the reason about  unrest.Obviously,  the link between economic conditions and unrest is complex.For example ,a tight link between fiscal consolidation and instability, across democracies and autocracies alike,the distributional issues play a role in inciting public ire,inequiltyand so on.


已有 3 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
eros_zz + 2 对论坛有贡献
bengdi1986 + 10 鼓励积极发帖讨论
桉树熊 + 3 + 3 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 10  学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 5   查看全部评分

使用道具

10
hubing580900 在职认证  发表于 2011-10-25 12:21:26 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
有美国在,就永远不会和平,将美国除掉,也不会有和平,总之,世界不会和平
已有 2 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
eros_zz + 1 对论坛有贡献
桉树熊 + 3 有兴趣可以看下《三体》吧~

总评分: 热心指数 + 4   查看全部评分

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-6-17 08:35