[论文写作规范] 天下为菊、SSCI、英语水平 [推广有奖]

匿名网友

71楼

匿名网友 发表于 2013-10-3 19:15:13

LeehowZhang 发表于 2013-10-3 12:53
作者过于犀利了。。。天下为菊才读博士没多久，能够这样一家很优秀了。我是做供应链的，虽然没有读过他的论 ...

你去看看他《统计研究》的那篇文章就知道了！这个论坛上有讨论的，你可以看看！那篇文章的质量就很高！

72楼

xjcz

发表于 2013-10-3 19:49:30

天下为菊——这确实是一本主要面对中国人的SSCI。一个在国内一流期刊都站不住脚的人，突然洋气起来了，哈哈，开心呐
本文来自: 人大经济论坛学术道德监督版，详细出处参考： https://bbs.pinggu.org/forum.php? ... amp;from^^uid=1819503

73楼

beebeeboybee 发表于 2013-10-3 20:20:46

不了解

74楼

淘宝网橙迷橙橙 发表于 2013-10-3 20:23:49

Many scientists were respected by people and science has made great development in the twentieth century. What role do scientists play in the process of scientific development? Does scientific development bring more researchers into scientists? This paper mainly analyzes the two interested questions and suggests that: (a) not all researchers’ output could be attributed to scientific knowledge, only the innovative output could promote science to develop. Scientists play a more significant role than the rest researchers in scientific development in average because scientists’ innovative consciousness is far higher than that of non-scientists. (b) Distinguishing scientists from researchers in accordance with the fixed basic contribution of innovative output in the process of scientific development. Researchers’ innovative work becomes easier with the accumulated scientific knowledge growing gradually in the initial stage of scientific development. Thus, scientific development could produce more and more scientists. On the contrary, researchers’ innovative work becomes more challenged with the accumulated scientific knowledge increasing gradually while science develops to a certain stage. As a result, scientific development would make researchers become scientist increasingly difficult.

一直认为自己的英文还不够达到英文发表的水平，只好先在中文期刊混。看了为菊的英文，突然自信起来了。
Scientometrics，原来经常看到有人发表这个刊物，还以为多牛的刊物。这个期刊要火了。