楼主: 孤松
1523 3

[财经时事] 2008年的诺贝尔经济学奖可能发给印度学者 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 1粉丝

硕士生

43%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
955686 个
通用积分
2.8500
学术水平
1 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
1 点
经验
3996 点
帖子
167
精华
0
在线时间
68 小时
注册时间
2004-10-10
最后登录
2023-10-22

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

Latest Nobel Buzz: Nobel Prize Prediction 2008

An article has boldly predicted that an economist of Indian decent will probably win the Nobel Prize this year. Their choices are;

1. Jagdish Bhagwati - International trade specialist
2. Avinash Dixit - Game theory, IO, International trade, .......
3. Partha Dasgupta - Development economics, environmental economics

I cannot say that I am familiar with their work, or even the fields that they have revolutionized, so I can't comment on this list. However, I would say that if Dixit wins, it probably won't be for his contributions to game theory or industrial organization, since there are plenty of other guys who have had more impact on these two fields.

The article continues to list some more economists who have a chance:
Peter Diamond - Macroeconomic titan
Dale Mortensen - search and matching theory in frictional unemployment
Christopher Pissarides - Again, search theory, unemployment
Elhanan Helpman - International trade titan
Robert Barro - Macroeconomic titan
Paul Krugman - New trade theory
Paul Romer - Endogenous Growth Theory
Gene Grossman - Work on asymmetric information (probably for incomplete contracts too)
Eugene Fama - Market Efficiency Hypothesis

I think all these guys deserve a prize. But in light of the recent financial turmoil, and the lack of common understanding that economists have displayed in response to this catastrophe, I think we should award the prize to Eugene Fama (and Kenneth French), and Richard Thaler (I really do not know why he is not mentioned more often). This award would be a joyful occasion to both sides of the profession: those who believe in government intervention and those who do not.

I studies finance during college, and I know how Fama's efficiency argument has been a basis for much of the deregulation argument (not to mention a whole bulk of finance theory is based on it), while Thaler's contributions to behavioral finance has led a whole new revolution on making economics more about homo sapiens than it is about homo economicus. In my opinion, both deserve the prize, and what better time to give the prize to them than now!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:诺贝尔经济学奖 诺贝尔经济学 经济学奖 诺贝尔 经济学 经济学 学者 诺贝尔 印度

沙发
张漫浩 发表于 2008-10-11 12:11:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

Yeah, It's Indian again. These days I looked through the news of the world, I found that the good effect of Indian in the whole world. Even though the frequent violence of India existed, but they(the west) said that: but India is a democratic country.

使用道具

藤椅
dannyd 发表于 2008-10-11 23:07:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

为什么中国创造了一个又一个经济奇迹 却被认为中国没有经济学家

美国凭什么经济学家云集,却创造了金融危机

使用道具

板凳
cloundsky 发表于 2008-10-11 23:24:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
以下是引用dannyd在2008-10-11 23:07:00的发言:

为什么中国创造了一个又一个经济奇迹 却被认为中国没有经济学家

美国凭什么经济学家云集,却创造了金融危机

this is a good question.

stupid man likes stupid girl,just so so.

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-11-6 07:17