楼主: bigfoot0517
1122 1

[外行报告] Fox-Pitt:美国银行业研究报告2009年2月 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 21粉丝

已卖:14110份资源

学术权威

21%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
12493638 个
通用积分
3.1784
学术水平
391 点
热心指数
369 点
信用等级
405 点
经验
28609 点
帖子
2147
精华
2
在线时间
242 小时
注册时间
2006-11-15
最后登录
2019-1-31

楼主
bigfoot0517 发表于 2009-2-20 12:48:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

US Equity Research February 12, 2009
US Banks Underweight
Analyst(s): Andrew Marquardt Andrew.Marquardt@fpk.com 212-857-6137
Thoughts on Midwest Banks Post 4Q, Stock Moves, and FSP
• Midwest Regional banks posted disappointing 4Q results, as 8 of 9 banks reported “core” EPS
below our tempered expectations (ASBC was in line) and all 9 missed vs consensus. The primary
driver for misses was higher than expected credit costs. See Fig 1 for summary.
• Estimate revisions were all down due to higher credit costs, lower fees, and higher core expense
run rates likely to continue into this year and next. With this note we are lowering our estimates for
CMA, FITB, and KEY following earnings. See Fig 2 for details.
• Key issues remain capital, loss content on balance sheets, and core earnings power. We
update our estimated loss content figures for 4Q actions—on average our Midwest banks have
realized 25% of est’d loss content on balance sheets (vs 13% as of 3Q) and est’d remaining losses
represent 35% of tangible common equity and 21% of Tier 1 capital. See Fig 4.
• Auto sector woes will hurt Midwest banks more than others, given regional economies heavily
dependent on auto and manufacturing as well as banks’ exposure to the auto sector—roughly 8% of
total loans (vs low to mid-single digit average nationally). See Fig 9.
• Financial Stability Plan (FSP) a positive in theory, but implementation still unclear, as one of
the key points to the plan is to potentially purchase problem assets, but the pricing and implications
still needs to be worked out. The “contingent equity” option is likely a non-started for many as banks
will ultimately still have to face the challenge of raising dilutive capital privately if fail “stress test”.
• We feel incrementally worse about HBAN and CMA following this quick update of estimated
remaining loss content and stressed capital levels (more for HBAN than CMA).
• Feel incrementally better about CBSH, FMER, and TCB and may indeed be the best defensive
plays among the group, given capital levels and estimated remaining loss content on balance sheet.
• Our top pick among Midwest regionals remains KEY, based on a combination of capital, remaining
loss content on balance sheet, degree of confidence and credibility in mgmt, and valuation.

295316.pdf (368.98 KB, 需要: 500 个论坛币)


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:行业研究报告 研究报告 美国银行 Pitt 行业研究 美国 研究报告 银行业

沙发
qiuth(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2009-2-20 13:09:00
垃圾,居然要500金,滚

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-9 13:40