【下载】稀缺资源:《资本论》（英文版2004Edition）

相似文件 换一批

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

<p>《资本论（英文版）》（2004 Edtion）——只有在对比中才能体验名著作为名著的整体感觉，领略名著真正的魅力和马克思主义经济学真谛。</p><p></p><p> 315901.rar (3.55 MB) 本附件包括：

• 资本论（英文版）.chm

2009-4-16 16:21:00 上传

[下载]资本论英文版（2004 Edition）

<br/> 318240.pdf (58.23 KB)

2009-4-23 10:25:00 上传

【下载】稀缺资源:《资本论》（英文版2004Edition）

<br/> 318241.pdf (114.81 KB)

2009-4-23 10:25:00 上传

【下载】稀缺资源:《资本论》（英文版2004Edition）

<br/></p><p>今天，上传两个免费下载的文件。</p>

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-30 10:36:03编辑过]

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享1 收藏9 回帖

关键词：Edition editio dition Edit 英文版 马克思 经济学 资本论 英文版 资源

Editor's Introduction(by David M. Hart)

There can be no doubting the significance of Marx's influence on both economic theory in the late 19th century and on the creation of Marxist states in the 20th century. From the time of the emergence of modern socialism in the 1840s, free market economists have criticised socialist theory and it is thus useful to place that criticism in its intellectual context, namely beside the main work of one of its leading theorists, Karl Marx.……

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-18 20:37:31编辑过]

(Continuing)

In 1848, when Europe was wracked by a series of revolutions in which both liberals and socialists participated and which both lost out to the forces of conservative monarchism or Bonapartism, John Stuart Mill published his Principles of Political Economy. The chapter on Property shows how important Mill thought it was to confront the socialist challenge to classical liberal economic theory.

 In hindsight it might appear that Mill was too accommodating to socialist criticism, but I would argue that in fact he offered a reasonable framework for comparing the two systems of thought, which the events of the late 20th century have finally brought to a conclusion which was not possible in his lifetime.

Mill states in Book II Chapter I "Of Property" that a fair comparison of the free market and socialism would compare both the ideal of liberalism with that of socialism, as well as the practice of liberalism versus the practice of socialism. In 1848 the ideals of both were becoming better known (and there were some aspects of the ideal of socialism which Mill found intriguing) but the practice of each was still not conclusive.

Mill correctly observed that in 1848 no European society had yet created a society fully based upon private property and free exchange and any future socialist experiment on a state-wide basis was many decades in the future. After the experiments in Marxist central planning with the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, the Chinese Communists in 1949, and numerous other Marxist states in the post-1945 period, there can be no doubt that the reservations Mill had about the practicality of fully-functioning socialism were completely borne out by historical events. What Mill could never have imagined, the slaughter of tens of millions of people in an effort to make socialism work, has ended for good any argument concerning the Marxist form of socialism.

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-19 17:04:41编辑过]

(Continuing)

The publication of the third volume was delayed still longer. When the second German edition of volume II appeared, in July, 1893, Engels was still working on volume [begin p.8]III. It was not until October, 1894, that the first German edition of volume III was published, in two separate parts, containing the subject matter of what had been originally planned as Book III of volume II, and treating of The Capitalist Process of Production as a whole.
 
The reasons for the delay in the publication of volumes II and III, and the difficulties encountered in solving the problem of elaborating the copious notes of Marx into a finished and connected presentation of his theories, have been fully explained by Engels in his various prefaces to these two volumes. His great modesty led him to belittle his own share in this fundamental work. As a matter of fact, a large portion of the contents of Capital is as much a creation of Engels as though he had written it independently of Marx.
 
Engels intended to issue the contents of the manuscripts for Book IV, originally planned as volume III, in the form of a fourth volume of Capital. But on the 6th of August, 1895, less than one year after the publication of volume III, he followed his co-worker into the grave, still leaving this work incompleted.
 
 

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-19 17:05:10编辑过]

谢谢楼主！

呵呵，客气了。我有时间会把文字慢慢贴上来的。

(Continuing)

The publication of the third volume was delayed still longer. When the second German edition of volume II appeared, in July, 1893, Engels was still working on volume [begin p.8]III. It was not until October, 1894, that the first German edition of volume III was published, in two separate parts, containing the subject matter of what had been originally planned as Book III of volume II, and treating of The Capitalist Process of Production as a whole.
 
The reasons for the delay in the publication of volumes II and III, and the difficulties encountered in solving the problem of elaborating the copious notes of Marx into a finished and connected presentation of his theories, have been fully explained by Engels in his various prefaces to these two volumes. His great modesty led him to belittle his own share in this fundamental work. As a matter of fact, a large portion of the contents of Capital is as much a creation of Engels as though he had written it independently of Marx.
 
Engels intended to issue the contents of the manuscripts for Book IV, originally planned as volume III, in the form of a fourth volume of Capital. But on the 6th of August, 1895, less than one year after the publication of volume III, he followed his co-worker into the grave, still leaving this work incompleted.
 
 

However, some years previous to his demise, and in anticipation of such a eventuality, he had appointed Karl Kautsky, the editor of Die Neue Zeit, the scientific organ of the German Socialist Party, as his successor and familiarized him personally with the subject matter intended for volume IV of this work. The material proved to be so voluminous, that Kautsky, instead of making a fourth volume of Capital out of it, abandoned the original plan and issued his elaboration as a separate work in three volumes under the title Theories of Surplus-value.

The first English translation of the first volume of Capital was edited by Engels and published in 1886. Marx had in the meantime made some changes in the text of the second [begin p.9]German edition and of the French translation, both of which appeared in 1873, and he had intended to superintend personally the edition of an English version. But the state of his health interfered with this plan. Engels utilised his notes and the text of the French edition of 1873 in the preparation of a third German edition, and this served as a basis for the first edition of the English translation.

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-19 17:06:06编辑过]

PREFACE
by Friedrich Engels
It was no easy task to prepare the second volume of "CAPITAL" for the printer in such a way
that it should make a connected and complete work and represent exclusively the ideas of its
author, not of its publisher. The great number of available manuscripts, and their fragmentary
character, added to the difficulties of this task. At best one single manuscript (No. 4) had been
revised throughout and made ready for the printer. And while it treated its subject-matter fully,
the greater part had become obsolete through subsequent revision. The bulk of the material was
not polished as to language, even if the subject-matter was for the greater part fully worked out.
The language was that in which Marx used to make his outlines, that is to say his style was
careless, full of colloquial, often rough and humorous, expressions and phrases, interspersed
with English and French technical terms, or with whole sentences or pages of English. The
thoughts were jotted down as they developed in the brain of the author. Some parts of the
argument would be fully treated, others of equal importance only indicated. The material to be
used for the illustration of facts would be collected, but barely arranged, much less worked out.
At the conclusion of the chapters there would be only a few incoherent sentences as mile-stones
of the incomplete deductions, showing the haste of the author in passing on to the next chapter.
And finally, there was the well-known handwriting which Marx himself was sometimes unable
to decipher.

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-20 20:56:09编辑过]

PREFACE
by Friedrich Engels
It was no easy task to prepare the second volume of "CAPITAL" for the printer in such a way
that it should make a connected and complete work and represent exclusively the ideas of its
author, not of its publisher. The great number of available manuscripts, and their fragmentary
character, added to the difficulties of this task. At best one single manuscript (No. 4) had been
revised throughout and made ready for the printer. And while it treated its subject-matter fully,
the greater part had become obsolete through subsequent revision. The bulk of the material was
not polished as to language, even if the subject-matter was for the greater part fully worked out.
The language was that in which Marx used to make his outlines, that is to say his style was
careless, full of colloquial, often rough and humorous, expressions and phrases, interspersed
with English and French technical terms, or with whole sentences or pages of English. The
thoughts were jotted down as they developed in the brain of the author. Some parts of the
argument would be fully treated, others of equal importance only indicated. The material to be
used for the illustration of facts would be collected, but barely arranged, much less worked out.
At the conclusion of the chapters there would be only a few incoherent sentences as mile-stones
of the incomplete deductions, showing the haste of the author in passing on to the next chapter.
And finally, there was the well-known handwriting which Marx himself was sometimes unable
to decipher.

I have been content to interpret these manuscripts as literally as possible, changing the style
only in places where Marx would have changed it himself and interpolating explanatory
sentences or connecting statements only where this was indispensable, and where the meaning
was so clear that there could be no doubt of the correctness of my interpretation. [begin p.8]
Sentences which seemed in the least ambiguous were preferably reprinted literally. The
passages which I have remodeled or interpolated cover barely ten pages in print, and concern
mainly matters of form.
P.2
The mere enumeration of the manuscripts left by Marx as a basis for Volume II proves the
unparalleled conscientiousness and strict self-criticism which he practiced in his endeavor to
fully elaborate his great economic discoveries before he published them. This self-criticism
rarely permitted him to adapt his presentation of the subject, in content as well as in form, to his
ever widening horizon, which he enlarged by incessant study.
P.3
The material for this second volume consists of the following parts: First, a manuscript entitled
"A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy," containing 1472 quarto pages in 23
divisions, written in the time from August, 1861, to June, 1863. It is a continuation of the work
of the same title, the first volume of which appeared in Berlin, in 1859. It treats on pages 1-220,
and again pages 1159-1472, of the subject analyzed in Volume I of "CAPITAL," beginning
with the transformation of money into capital and continuing to the end of the volume, and is
P.4
the first draft for this subject. Pages 973-1158 deal with capital and profit, rate of profit,
merchant's capital and money capital, that is to say with subjects which have been farther
developed in the manuscript for Volume III. The questions belonging to Volume II and many of
those which are part of Volume III are not arranged by themselves in this manuscript. They are
merely treated in passing, especially in the section which makes up the main body of the
manuscript, viz.: pages 220-972, entitled "Theories of Surplus Value." This section contains an
exhaustive critical history of the main point of political economy, the theory of surplus value,
and develops at the same time, in polemic remarks against the position of the predecessors of
Marx, most of the points which he has later on discussed individually and in their logical
connection in Volume II and III. I reserve [begin p.9]for myself the privilege of publishing the
critical part of this manuscript, after the elimination of the numerous parts covered by Volumes
II and III, in the form of Volume IV. This manuscript, valuable though it is, could not be used
in the present edition of Volume II.