楼主: 瓦蓝的飘
1517 3

[统计软件与数据分析] 因素影响程度及变化趋势分析 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 0粉丝

大专生

93%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0.1500
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
751 点
帖子
27
精华
0
在线时间
84 小时
注册时间
2012-12-20
最后登录
2024-3-17

6论坛币
求问大家一下,目前想研究A因素对B因素影响的程度大小,并且分析出这种影响程度的变化趋势,目前知道的可以用灰色关联度做分析,不知道是否还有其他的分析方法呢,跪求大神!!!

关键词:趋势分析 影响程度 灰色关联度 灰色关联 分析方法 影响
沙发
Tse_Leung 发表于 2016-3-4 20:20:55 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
格兰杰因果检验、皮尔森相关分析等等好像都可以吧

使用道具

In multivariate statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a statistical method used to uncover the underlying structure of a relatively large set of variables. EFA is a technique within factor analysis whose overarching goal is to identify the underlying relationships between measured variables. It is commonly used by researchers when developing a scale (a scale is a collection of questions used to measure a particular research topic) and serves to identify a set of latent constructs underlying a battery of measured variables. It should be used when the researcher has no a priori hypothesis about factors or patterns of measured variables. Measured variables are any one of several attributes of people that may be observed and measured. An example of a measured variable would be the physical height of a human being. Researchers must carefully consider the number of measured variables to include in the analysis.[2] EFA procedures are more accurate when each factor is represented by multiple measured variables in the analysis.

EFA is based on the common factor model. Within the common factor model, a function of common factors, unique factors, and errors of measurements expresses measured variables. Common factors influence two or more measured variables, while each unique factor influences only one measured variable and does not explain correlations among measured variables.

EFA assumes that any indicator/measured variable may be associated with any factor. When developing a scale, researchers should use EFA first before moving on to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA requires the researcher to make a number of important decisions about how to conduct the analysis because there is no one set method.

Reference: Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure-alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(4), pp. 403-414

Warne, R. T., & Larsen, R. (2014). Evaluating a proposed modification of the Guttman rule for determining the number of factors in an exploratory factor analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56, 104-123

已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
dongyang198 + 100 精彩帖子

总评分: 论坛币 + 100   查看全部评分

使用道具

板凳
cuixzhe 发表于 2016-3-7 09:04:22 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
自变量就一个的话,可以考虑一元线性回归分析方法

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-6-19 10:57