楼主: william9225
1072 5

[财经英语角区] 【金融市场】China investment bank defaults on ‘dim sum’ bond [推广有奖]

版主

巨擘

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

文库之星

【William新闻精选】

2019经济报刊周刊精选

威望
15
论坛币
1437739 个
通用积分
155.9925
学术水平
3616 点
热心指数
3969 点
信用等级
3571 点
经验
676818 点
帖子
18353
精华
60
在线时间
4871 小时
注册时间
2015-2-12
最后登录
2024-2-21

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
source from:FT website
Investment Banking  Following
China investment bank defaults on ‘dim sum’ bond
Guosen Securities’ Hong Kong arm in first SOE offshore debt breach in nearly 20 years
屏幕快照 2016-03-31 17.02.32.png
5 HOURS AGO by: Gabriel Wildau in Shanghai and Don Weinland in Hong Kong
A unit of Guosen Securities, China’s eighth-largest investment bank, has defaulted on a Hong Kong-traded renminbi bond, according to a document seen by the Financial Times, marking the first debt breach by a state-owned enterprise in China’s offshore market in nearly two decades.


The technical default by Guosen's Hong Kong affiliate puts at risk a Rmb38m ($5.9m) coupon payment due April 24 on Rmb1.2bn in “dim sum” bonds sold in 2014. Missing that payment would set a precedent for the offshore units of Chinese SOEs, whose creditors widely assume the onshore parent will always stand behind its affiliates, according to analysts.


The default was unexpected because Guosen’s onshore unit is by all appearances in rude health. With the city government of Shenzhen as its largest shareholder, Guosen Securities Ltd was 12th in the league table for onshore equity underwriting in 2015, according to Dealogic, down from fourth in 2014.


The Shenzhen-listed brokerage earned net profit of Rmb14.2bn in 2015, up 188 per cent from a year earlier, according to a filing in January. It ranked eighth among mainland brokerages by assets at the end of 2014, according to industry association figures.


Like other Chinese securities companies, Guosen benefited from a surge in stock trading commissions during China’s equity market roller coaster last year. But its offshore unit, Guosen Securities (HK) Financial Holdings, has struggled to gain a foothold in Hong Kong’s capital markets, where foreign and mainland banks compete on a more level playing field.


A special purpose vehicle owned by Guosen (HK) issued the bonds in April 2014 at an interest rate of 6.4 per cent.


State media reported in 2011 that Guosen HK had doubled its staff in Hong Kong to 200 that year after hiring HSBC veteran Chen Gang to head its investment banking division. The company hoped to help mainland companies looking to tap the Hong Kong capital markets.


The dim sum bond market emerged around 2010 as China moved to encourage international use of its currency. With renminbi accumulating in Hong Kong and other offshore financial hubs, Chinese and foreign issuers took advantage of interest rates typically lower than those available in China’s onshore debt market. Last year, offshore renminbi bond issuance slumped to $17bn after hitting a record $33bn in 2014, according to Dealogic. Some $64bn in such bonds is currently outstanding.


After years in which investors reliably assumed that China’s government would not permit any corporate default, missed payments have become more common in both the onshore and offshore bond markets, but SOE defaults remain rare.


Baoding Tianwei, a manufacturer of electric transformers, became the first SOE to default on a domestic bond last April.


In the offshore market, companies including LDK Solar and property developer Kaisa Group have defaulted in recent years, but neither an SOE nor any Chinese financial institution has defaulted since the collapse of Guangdong International Trust and Investment in 1999.


Bank of New York Mellon’s Hong Kong branch, which serves as trustee for the bond, warned Guosen’s bondholders that a provision of the so-called keepwell deed associated with the Guosen bond “is not in full force and effect, which constitutes an Event of Default”, according to the document dated March 23.


Chinese companies have used keepwell structures in offshore bond sales as a way to provide a degree of security to foreign investors. Until mid-2014, China’s foreign exchange regulator forbade onshore companies from issuing direct guarantees of offshore debt.


“Keepwell deeds are not guarantees and are subject to much greater legal and regulatory uncertainty than compared to guarantees,” Gary Lau, managing director at ratings agency Moody’s, warned in 2014.


Most Chinese offshore bonds are issued through tax-haven-domiciled SPVs, leaving investors with little recourse to onshore assets. It was not clear which provision of the keepwell deed, which was agreed by Guosen’s onshore parent, had been violated.


Shares in Guosen Securities were up 0.6 per cent in Shenzhen on Thursday.


Guosen Securities (HK) Financial Holdings and Guosen Securities Ltd did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Investment investmen Defaults Default Invest investment Investment Shanghai defaults document

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
fumingxu 发表于 2016-3-31 17:09:19 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

藤椅
qingranmeng 发表于 2016-3-31 17:15:52 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
william9225 发表于 2016-3-31 17:04
source from:FT website
Investment Banking  Following
China investment bank defaults on ‘dim sum’ ...
楼主辛苦了

使用道具

板凳
hjtoh 发表于 2016-3-31 17:55:59 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
william9225 发表于 2016-3-31 17:04
source from:FT website
Investment Banking  Following
China investment bank defaults on ‘dim sum’ ...
谢谢分享

使用道具

报纸
offerlover 发表于 2016-3-31 23:52:03 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

地板
alexwoooo 发表于 2016-4-5 13:46:34 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Missing that payment would set a precedent for the offshore units of Chinese SOEs, whose creditors widely assume the onshore parent will always stand behind its affiliates

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-10 09:47