楼主: fumingxu
937 4

[学科前沿] 【独家发布】【朝花夕拾-万物之灵】-类人猿也会“读心”? [推广有奖]

泰斗

51%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

经管朝花夕拾万花筒

行为决策+行为经济学+行为金融

威望
6
论坛币
198557 个
通用积分
38560.1128
学术水平
2511 点
热心指数
2986 点
信用等级
2477 点
经验
42750 点
帖子
20947
精华
11
在线时间
6222 小时
注册时间
2012-3-26
最后登录
2024-4-27

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
类人猿也会“读心”
人类并非唯一能够理解他人错误想法的物种
这双眼睛后面可能有着更为深邃的思想。图片来源:Michael Nichols/NGS
报讯 闹剧的乐趣在于观看不知情者所犯的错误,而一项新的研究发现,类人猿似乎也能够看懂这样的笑话。
发表在最新一期美国《科学》杂志上的一项研究指出,像人类一样,黑猩猩以及其他类人猿能够推断其他同类的想法——即便这些想法与现实相矛盾,并预测到它们的错误。
这一发现与之前的许多研究相悖,同时也为有关识别他人欲望、信念和内心想法是否为人类独有能力的争论添了一把柴,而这一概念被称为心智理论。
在之前的研究中,黑猩猩似乎能够领悟其他同类的目标、常识和认知的某些方面。但黑猩猩、猴子和其他类人猿一直无法被证明能够理解其他同类的错误想法,而这也是心智理论的一个重要组成部分。
与此同时,不到4岁的人类儿童历史上也在很多此类的测试中败下阵来,从而表明理解错误想法的能力需要在随后的童年时期发展出的复杂思维。
然而在2007年,一项婴儿研究对上述观念提出了挑战。受到这一研究的启发,心理学家开始在黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和猩猩中重新分析这一问题。
为了解猿类是否也有类似心智,美国、日本和德国研究人员制作了两个简短视频,让黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和猩猩3种猿类观看,并用眼红外跟踪器对它们的注视焦点进行追踪。
在第一个视频中,人类扮演的假猩猩从背后拍打两下某人,然后在被袭击者的注视下躲到身旁两个草堆中的一个;被袭击者通过一扇门离开后,假猩猩钻出草堆逃离现场;当被袭击者拿着棍子再次出现时,如果猿类能理解他人想法,它们必定会预测被袭击者会走向假猩猩一开始藏匿的草堆。结果显示,30只猿类中有2/3确实目光注视着假猩猩一开始躲过的草堆。
第二个视频与第一个视频大体类似,主要不同就是干草堆换成了箱子,假猩猩从某人手上抢到一个石块,然后藏到两个箱子中的一个,在被抢者离开后再把石头拿走。当被抢者再次出现时,大多数猿类正确地预测被抢者到不正确的箱子找石头。
这两个视频意味着,猿类能对人类认为假猩猩或石头藏在什么地方作出正确的判断,它们了解人的想法。研究人员在一份声明中说:“这是非人类动物第一次通过‘错误信念’测试。”
与日本京都大学Fumihiro Kano一道负责该项研究的德国莱比锡马普学会进化人类学研究所Christopher Krupenye认为,这项研究成果确实令人感到惊讶。“对于人类而言,这些场景看上去很傻,就像查理·卓别林的电影。但对于类人猿而言,这是一个新奇的社会冲突。”它同时也很有趣,因为类人猿在之前用来检验这一想法的测试中表现得很糟糕。他说:“在某种程度上,我认为这是一次最后的努力。”
研究人员说,这项发现表明,了解别人想法不正确的能力并不是人类所独有,而是至少从1800万至1300万年前人类与黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和猩猩的最后共同祖先就可能开始拥有。“如果能有进一步实验证实这些发现,那么科学家可能需要重新思考猿类对彼此的了解有多深。”
美国康涅狄格州纽黑文市耶鲁大学认知心理学家Laurie Santos认为:“这是一个非常震撼人心的发现。”她强调,“如果这些研究结果是站得住脚的,它们将改变人们思考灵长类动物社会认知能力的方式。”而加拿大金斯顿女王大学发育心理学家Valerie Kuhlmeier则称赞研究人员完成了一项非常困难且精心设计的试验。(赵熙熙)
《中国科学报》 (2016-10-13 第2版 国际)
转自:http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2016/10/358210.shtm
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:朝花夕拾 类人猿 christopher Nichols Michael personal 朝花夕拾 类人猿

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
fumingxu 发表于 2016-10-13 12:07:04 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
201610131025209090.jpg

使用道具

藤椅
fumingxu 发表于 2016-10-13 12:09:16 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Apes can tell when you've been duped
Humans might not be the only ones that understand when others harbour mistaken beliefs.
Helen Shen
06 October 2016
Article toolsRights & Permissions
Michael Nichols/NGS
There's a lot more going on behind those eyes than researchers previously thought.
The delight of slapstick comedy lies in watching the mistakes of unwitting players, and new research shows that apes just might get the joke, too. A study published on 6 October in Science suggests that, like humans, chimpanzees and other apes can infer the beliefs of others ­— even when those beliefs contradict reality — and anticipate their errors1.
The findings, which counter many previous studies, could fuel the debate over whether humans are unique in their ability to recognize the desires, beliefs and internal thoughts of others — a concept known as theory of mind.
In previous studies, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have seemed to grasp some aspects of the goals, knowledge and perceptions of others2. But chimps, monkeys and other primates have consistently failed to demonstrate an understanding of others’ false beliefs — a key component of theory of mind2, 3. Children younger than age four had also historically failed many of these tests4, supporting the idea that understanding false beliefs requires sophisticated thinking that develops later in childhood.
Related stories
Dogs can tell when praise is sincere
Monkeys seem to recognize their reflections
Rats free each other from cages
More related stories
But in 2007, a study of infants challenged this concept4. Researchers found that babies as young as 25 months, looked first at where an actor would search (incorrectly) for an object after it had been moved without the actor’s knowledge. Inspired by these results, a team of comparative psychologists borrowed the method to revisit the question in chimpanzees, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and orangutans (Pongo abelii).
The study's results were definitely a surprise, says Christopher Krupenye, now at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who co-led the work with Fumihiro Kano at Kyoto University’s Kumamoto Sanctuary in Kumamoto, Japan. This was especially intriguing because apes had done so poorly in previous experiments designed to examine this question. “To some extent, I saw this as a last-ditch effort," he says.
Putting on a show
To tailor their task for apes, the researchers went for entertainment value to ensure that the animals paid attention to various scenarios. In two separate experiments, the team created and starred in a series of short films depicting combative interactions between a human and a person dressed in a ‘King Kong’ suit.
Each series began by introducing the story’s premise: a human searching for either a stone or King Kong. In one series, the human whacked a stick against one of two haystacks where they had watched King Kong hide; in the other, the person would lift one of two boxes under which they had seen King Kong tuck a stolen stone. These scenes showed the apes that the person would pursue the object in its last known location.
“For humans, these scenes look silly, almost like Charlie Chaplin scenes. But for apes, it’s a novel social conflict,” says Krupenye. The slightly bizarre quality of the scenarios was intentional to keep the animals from drawing on knowledge of familiar situations.
In the films, the object (King Kong or the stone) was eventually moved from its initial location (haystack or box) to the other — sometimes while the human observed, and other times while the human was absent. Then, the object was removed from the scene altogether while the human was away, in part to prevent the apes from expressing their own beliefs about the object’s location. The videos ended with the person returning to the arena, approaching both empty locations and preparing to search without giving any indication of where they would look.
The eyes have it
At the deciding moment, about 20–30 apes responded by looking at one of the two locations. Of those animals, about two-thirds to three-quarters, depending on the experiment, looked first to where the human would have thought their target was hiding. This predictive ability suggests that apes understand the incorrect beliefs of others, says Kano.
“It’s a pretty shocking result,” says cognitive psychologist Laurie Santos at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut — citing many primate studies, including her own3, which suggest that the animals lack this skill. The effect reported in this study is small, she notes. But “if these results hold up, they’ll be a game changer for the way that people think about primate social cognition”, Santos adds.
Valerie Kuhlmeier, a developmental psychologist at Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, commends the group for executing a difficult and carefully crafted experiment. But she offers a competing explanation for the results, one in which the apes used knowledge of abstract rules — specifically, that people tend to look for objects in the place they last saw them. Genuine false-belief understanding still seems to be uniquely human, contends Kuhlmeier.
Although the authors acknowledge that the apes could have followed learnt rules, Krupenye says, “they're still able to accurately predict others’ actions in more sophisticated contexts than we have thought before”. He plans to strengthen their case by demonstrating other forms of false-belief understanding in apes. “This is a first study that will hopefully energize interest in the topic,” says Krupenye.
Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20756
References
Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Science 354, 110–114 (2016).
ArticleChemPort
Show context
Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 187–192 (2008).
ArticlePubMed
Show context
Martin, A. & Santos, L. R. Cognition 130, 300–308 (2014).
ArticlePubMed
Show context
Southgate, V., Senju, A. & Csibra, G. Psychol. Sci. 18, 587–592 (2007).
ArticlePubMedChemPort
Show context
转自:http://www.nature.com/news/apes- ... -been-duped-1.20756

使用道具

板凳
Kamize 学生认证  发表于 2016-10-13 15:55:02 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
fumingxu 发表于 2016-10-13 12:06
类人猿也会“读心”
人类并非唯一能够理解他人错误想法的物种
这双眼睛后面可能有着更为深邃的思想。图片 ...
谢谢楼主分享的资料不错了啊!

使用道具

报纸
h2h2 发表于 2016-10-13 18:35:17 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢分享

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-28 03:16