楼主: liyingzhao
557 0

[商业管理] Question about Human Resource Management~ [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

高中生

17%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
879 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
292 点
帖子
9
精华
0
在线时间
28 小时
注册时间
2017-9-11
最后登录
2020-12-10

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Performance Management Improvements for Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) is one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical firms and is widely known for its innovative research. But the fi rm has not limited its innovations to products. Several years ago, BMS leaders decided that the company’s performance management system needed to be re-invented. Specifically, they determined that the existing performance appraisal process was not working. Managers were “form focused,” meaning that they were so concentrated on filling out
the performance review forms, the content of the forms was not being used for employee coaching and based on development. Also, most of the attention of managers and employees was historical and based on what employees had done in the past. Little attention was being given to how employees could develop and improve in the future. The most radical steps taken were to totally eliminate the appraisal forms and their rating scales and to request that managers not discuss
pay increases during performance review sessions. Instead, a new “performance partnership” became the focus. At all levels of BMS, managers were trained to hold regular meetings with their employees. At these meetings managers and employees
review performance goals expectations. Together they set expectations and timelines for accomplishing the goals. Rather than meeting just once a year, the performance partnership update occurs throughout the year. The changes in the performance management system have led to several positive results. First, employees are more active participants, rather than just getting their ratings on forms and then passively listening to the managers. Also, a greater amount of time is spent on coaching because managers were trained on use of a guided feedback approach. This approach has led to more discussions in which employees and managers emphasize joint problem solving and goal achievements. Although the system takes more
managerial and employee time, the coaching and employee involvement have created a more positive relationship and improved individual and managerial performance.
Questions
1. Discuss how this case illustrates the contrasts between the administrative use and developmental use of appraisals.
2. Identify some of the advantages and disadvantages of eliminating the use of appraisal forms and ratings.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Management Managemen resource question Manage

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-6-14 19:56