ÄãºÃ£¬»¶Ó­À´µ½¾­¹ÜÖ®¼Ò [µÇ¼] [×¢²á]

ÉèΪÊ×Ò³ | ¾­¹ÜÖ®¼ÒÊ×Ò³ | Êղر¾Õ¾

²úƷȱÏݼ°ÆäÈ϶¨±ê×¼µÄ±È½ÏÑо¿_¹ú¼ÊóÒ×ÂÛÎÄ·¶ÎÄ

·¢²¼Ê±¼ä£º2014-12-05 À´Ô´£ºÈË´ó¾­¼ÃÂÛ̳
¹ú¼ÊóÒ×ÂÛÎÄ·¶ÎÄ ÕýÎÄĿ¼ µÚÒ»Õ ÒýÑÔ1 µÚÒ»½Ú Ñ¡ÌâµÄ±³¾°ÓëÒâÒå1 µÚ¶þ½Ú Ñо¿µÄ»ù±¾ÄÚÈÝÓë·½·¨1 µÚ¶þÕ ²úƷȱÏݵĽ綨3 µÚÒ»½Ú ²úƷȱÏݸÅÄî3 Ò»¡¢¹ú¼ÊÉϹØÓÚ²úƷȱÏݵĶ¨Òå3 ¶þ¡¢Öйú·¨ÂÉÖеIJúƷȱÏݸÅÄî4 Èý¡¢²úƷȱÏÝÀà±ð5 µÚ¶þ½Ú ²úƷȱÏݶ¨ÒåÖвúÆ·µÄ·¶Î§6 µÚÈýÕ ²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨8 µÚÒ»½Ú ²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨¸ÅÊö8 µÚ¶þ½Ú ²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨±ê×¼8 Ò»¡¢¹ú¼Ê²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨±ê×¼8 ¶þ¡¢Öйú²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨±ê×¼10 µÚÈý½Ú Öйú²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨±ê×¼Ö®²»×ã¼°¸Ä½ø11 Ò»¡¢²»×ãÖ®´¦11 ¶þ¡¢¸Ä½ø½¨Òé12 µÚËÄÕ ×ܽá14 ²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×15 Ö ¡¡Ð»17 Õª Òª ¡°²úƷȱÏÝ¡±ÊDzúÆ·ÔðÈÎÖƶÈÖеĺËÐĸÅÄî¡£¾ÍÁ¢·¨Êµ¼ù¶øÑÔ£¬ÎÒ¹úÓɶಿ·¨ÂÉ¡¢·¨¹æ¹¹³ÉµÄ²úÆ·ÔðÈÎÌåϵÖеġ°²úƷȱÏÝ¡±¸ÅÄÅжϱê×¼²»Í³Ò»£¬´Ó¶øµ¼Ö·¨ÂÉÊÊÓÃÀ§¾³¡£ÃÀ¹ú²úÆ·ÔðÈη¨Æð²½½ÏÔ磬·¢Õ¹½Ï¿ì£¬ÔÚ²úƷȱÏݵÄÁ¢·¨·½ÃæΪÎÒ¹úÌṩÁËÐí¶à¾­ÑéºÍÖµµÃÎÒ¹ú²Î¿¼µÄµØ·½¡£Ñ¡ÔñÕâÑùÒ»¸ö³ÉÊìÎÊÌâÖб»ºöÂÔµÄϸ½ÚΪÇÐÈëµã£¬Ê×ÏÈ´Ó¹úÄÚÍâÁ½·½ÃæµÄ½Ç¶È£¬¶Ô²úƷȱÏݵĶ¨Òå¡¢ÐÎʽµÈÏà¹Ø¸ÅÄî½øÐÐÁ˲ûÊö£¬½øÐÐÀíÂÛ֪ʶÉϵÄÆ̵档Ëæºó¶ÔÖÐÃÀ²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨±ê×¼¼°ÆäÀíÂÛÕ¹¿ª·ÖÎöºÍ±È½Ï¡£ÎÒ¹ú²úƷȱÏÝÈ϶¨Ç¿ÖÆÐÔ±ê×¼ÓÅÏÈÓÚÒ»°ã±ê×¼£¬¶øÔÚʵ¼ùÖÐË«Öرê×¼¾ßÓÐÏ൱´óµÄ±×¶Ë¡£Ìá³öÁËһЩ¸Ä¸ï½¨ÒéºÍ¹¹Ï룬½¨ÒéÐγÉÒ»ÖÖ»ìºÏÐÍÈ϶¨±ê×¼£¬¸Ã±ê×¼Ó¦ÒÔÒ»°ã±ê׼ΪÖ÷£¬Ç¿ÖƱê׼Ϊ¸¨£¬Í¬Ê±¸ù¾Ýʵ¼ÊÇé¿öµÄÐèÒª£¬½è¼øºÍÎüÊÕ¹úÍâÆäËûÅж¨±ê×¼£¬ÔÚʵ¼ùÖÐÓÐÕë¶ÔÐԵؽøÐÐÁé»îÔËÓᣠ¹Ø¼ü´Ê£º²úƷȱÏÝ£¬È϶¨±ê×¼£¬±È½ÏÑо¿ ABSTRACT The ¡°defect¡± is the key concept in the product liability system. As far as law-making practice£¬the denotations of concepts of ¡°defect¡± in many laws or rules about product liability system are inconsistent£¬which result in the dilemma of the law application. American products liability law starts early and has developed rather rap idly. We will reap much valuable experience through its law - making practice. With the neglected detail among the problem as the point of the penetration£¬this thesis studies some theories from home and abroad£¬makes a comparative study of the identifications of products liability defect and kinds of America and China£¬and analyses the implication of American products liability law on Chinese legislation. The status of Statutory Standards and Industry Standards are above Consumer Expectations Standards£¬and it¡¯s is not conducive to the execution of law practice. This thesis advises some reform proposals .It is suggested that we should construct a hybrid standard like ¡°Consumer Expectations Standards first£¬Statutory Standards and Industry Standards second£¬take different standards according to the actual situations as well.¡± KEYWORDS£ºProduct Defect£¬Standards of Product Defect Identification£¬Comparative Study
¾­¹ÜÖ®¼Ò¡°Ñ§µÀ»á¡±Ð¡³ÌÐò
  • ɨÂë¼ÓÈë¡°¿¼ÑÐѧϰ±Ê¼ÇȺ¡±
ÍƼöÔĶÁ
¾­¼ÃѧÏà¹ØÎÄÕÂ
±êÇ©ÔÆ
¾­¹ÜÖ®¼Ò¾«²ÊÎÄÕÂÍƼö